Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using EA to request a certificate from CA on behalf of AMT for TLS mode is successful, but the logging is confusing. #17

Open
mtpham-1 opened this issue Mar 15, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@mtpham-1
Copy link

Describe the bug 🪲

Running RPC local and leveraging EA to request a TLS certificate works, but when EA logs the transaction, it says "802.1x eap-tls request". This can be very confusing to customers.

To Reproduce 🪜
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Go to 'EA' to setup the details for TLS mode configuration
  2. From the vPro system, run command. This is example of Minh's command = rpc2.29.exe configure tls -mode Server -password P@ssw0rd -eaAddress "http://10.0.0.61:8000/" -eaUsername admin -eaPassword P@ssw0rd -v
  3. Go to EA > Console and view logging
  4. There is a line that say "802.1x eap-ls request". See screenshot attached.

Expected behavior
Recommend changing this log to say something generic like "Certificate Request."

Screenshots 🖼️
image

AMT Device (please complete the following information): 🖥️

  • OS: [e.g. Linux Kernel & Version]
  • AMT Version: [e.g. 11.8.5, 12.0.45]
  • AMT Configuration Mode: [e.g. Admin Control Mode or Client Control Mode]
  • Network Configuration [e.g. Dynamic IP or Static IP]

Service Deployment (please complete the following information): ⛈️

  • Deployment Type: RPC local provisioning
  • Component & Version: EA version 2.29
@mtpham-1
Copy link
Author

I forgot to mention, this configuration is for enterprise TLS mode, not 802.1x config, that is why it will be confusing to the customer. Change it to read a generic term like "Certificate Request."

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant