You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
when balancing genome-wide and invoking ignore_diags (which is 2 by default) cooler will ignore neighboring trans data as well ... in case there are tiny-tiny chromosomes, e.g. 1-pixel in size:
if this is my hi-c heatmap:
this is what's going to ignored, when balancing with ignore_diags=2 :
note that the pixel related to chr2-chr3 trans-interactions is also ignored ...
case for tiny crhomosomes : - maybe there are tiny contigs , maybe some sorta crispr constructs, plasmids, - they could be tiny and maybe represented as a standalone chromosome ...
is balancing justified for such single-bin chromosomes, - don't know - probably not
is it a desired behavior or should cis- only diagonal be ignored ? probably cis-only - as with ignore-diags we are trying to avoid Hi-C artefacts ...
maybe there is no clearly right or wrong solution, then it's just important to document stuff like that
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
when balancing genome-wide and invoking
ignore_diags
(which is 2 by default) cooler will ignore neighboring trans data as well ... in case there are tiny-tiny chromosomes, e.g. 1-pixel in size:if this is my hi-c heatmap:
this is what's going to ignored, when balancing with
ignore_diags=2
:note that the pixel related to chr2-chr3 trans-interactions is also ignored ...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: