Test report 11.12.2015 - Speed reduction flag is not consistent with planning area speed reduction

[BaseliyosJacob]

Speed reduction flag is not consistent with planning area speed reduction.
@JakobGartner @ShuangjiaoCao

[JakobGartner]

From TrackAtlas point of view, there is only one output going to DMI containing speed profile information.

If there are differences in their interpretation, the source cannot be in TrackAtlas (the only data relevant to speed profiles emitted by TrackAtlas is the MRSP profile)

I assume that the flag and the planning area are both working on the MRSP info? Or is one of them using info from SDM?

On 11 Dec 2015, at 16:44, Baseliyos Jacob [email protected] wrote:

Speed reduction flag is not consistent with planning area speed reduction.
@JakobGartner https://github.com/JakobGartner @ShuangjiaoCao https://github.com/ShuangjiaoCao
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/3975810/11747967/4731b7c2-a026-11e5-9847-3c78beef14a5.png
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/3975810/11747978/5276b13c-a026-11e5-8a03-53cb44ffabb6.png
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #987.

[BaseliyosJacob]

We were a little bit surprise about the difference of the position on the DMI and the Loc_Abs position in the data from track atlas to DMI.

But @ShuangjiaoCao will check at monday again the files to the DMI t o be sure there is no issue in the controller. Can you please check your data as well?

Thank you very much

[JakobGartner]

yes I am checking.

Are we using the same algorithm for determination of the position?

On 11 Dec 2015, at 17:30, Baseliyos Jacob [email protected] wrote:

We were a little bit surprise about the difference of the position on the DMI and the Loc_Abs position in the data from track atlas to DMI.

But @ShuangjiaoCao https://github.com/ShuangjiaoCao will check at monday again the files to the DMI t o be sure there is no issue in the controller. Can you please check your data as well?

Thank you very much

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #987 (comment).