You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
On Feb 13, 2020, at 5:46 PM, Matt Spinler ***@***.***> wrote:
As those links are just for TODOs, and they are publicly accessible, and only IBM contributes to this repo...
The goal is to get business partners to work-on / feel-like-equal-peers-when-contributing-to this repo too. They have their own bug-trackers. We could allow anyone to post links to any random company specific bug-tracker, but the de-facto standard is to do as Gunnar suggests, and not have any at all. This is a very well established collaborative software development norm. We want to be normal right?
Should not have a link to a company-specific repo in the OpenBMC.
openpower-proc-control/procedures/phal/start_host.cpp
Line 35 in b181d3b
openpower-proc-control/proc_control.cpp
Line 107 in b181d3b
Consider using more industry-standard terminology. "IPL" is an IBMism, should use boot instead.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: