chore: update mathlib nightly 2024-11-21 #866
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thank you for the heads-up, I'll take a look tomorrow morning and use the standard lemmas |
|
Alive Statistics: 90 / 93 (3 failed) |
|
Done! |
|
thank you so much @ineol :) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
CC: @ineol some theorems (e.g.
Array.mem_push) exist already, with the same name and a slightly different declaration inArray/Lemmas, and this is currently breaking the build. For now I commented the theorems inForLean, but that obviously did not solve the problem. I'm happy to rename the theorems you wrote with a'if that's okay for you, but you might want to take a look at the existing theorems and maybe see if they can be useful?