-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Testing saivs using SAI Challanger On x86 with sonicvs(SONiC BuildImage from community SONiC) as well as sonic-vs enterprise sonic from Broadcom #204
Comments
Please provide your testbed description file, exact steps that were used and full output of the error that you see. I'd suggest to start with a single TC execution. E.g., run pytest with |
The testbed file that i am using |
From the logs I clearly see that SAI-C is not able to SSH to SONiC:
From the IP address The simplest way to make it work is to run SONiC VS under GNS3. Connect standard GNS3 NAT appliance to eth0 of SONiC VS. As a result, SONiC VS will get mgmt IP dynamically which will be NAT'ed to your host PC. In such case you should be able to SSH to your SONiC VS from your host PC. This will make SAI-C happy as well ;) |
I am trying to test saivs with sai challanger I followed this step
followed the steps to build and sai challanger from clonning it on github
https://github.com/opencomputeproject/SAI-Challenger/blob/main/docs/sonic_usecase.md#prepare-testbed-desciption-file
setup the ip of eth0 as 10.11.12.13/24 and replaced into testbed getting this error in the both sonicvs
`
**70 skipped, 11 warnings, 1177 errors in 19.85s =======================================================================================
ERROR: "docker exec ${TTY} ${CONTAINER} bash -c "${EXEC_CMD}"" command filed with exit code 1.
===========================================
SAI Challenger run options
Docker image type : client
Container name : sc-client-run
Command : pytest -v --testbed=saivs_standalone_vs
===========================================**
`
Is anyone used it earlier?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: