Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarification on replace and union_replace with only CLI Origin #206

Open
rmomin-arista opened this issue Mar 22, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@rmomin-arista
Copy link

Should a replace with only CLI origin replace OpenConfig configuration?

Per gnmi-union_replace.md , When performing a gNMI SetRequest replace operation, the entire configuration that the CLI manages (subject to the namespace rules) should be ‘erased’ and replaced with the contents of the CLI ASCII blob value. It is acknowledged that the entire CLI configuration may contain configuration items which overlap with other origins

Is the expectation that a replace with only CLI origin will replace any OpenConfig configuration that is writeable by CLI?

For a union_replace with only CLI origin, is the expectation that the origin OpenConfig configuration is untouched?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant