fix: added main id to main block

[Ankush1oo8]

Fixed the issue #510 and did not make any changes in format as per the instructions

[openedx-webhooks]

Thanks for the pull request, @Ankush1oo8!

What's next?

Please work through the following steps to get your changes ready for engineering review:

🔘 Get product approval

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

• If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
  • This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
• If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.

🔘 Provide context

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

• Dependencies

  This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...

• Blockers

  This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.

• Timeline information

  This PR must be merged by XX date because ...

• Partner information

  This is for a course on edx.org.

• Supporting documentation
• Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads

🔘 Submit a signed contributor agreement (CLA)

⚠️ We ask all contributors to the Open edX project to submit a signed contributor agreement or indicate their institutional affiliation.
Please see the CONTRIBUTING file for more information.

If you've signed an agreement in the past, you may need to re-sign.
See The New Home of the Open edX Codebase for details.

Once you've signed the CLA, please allow 1 business day for it to be processed.
After this time, you can re-run the CLA check by adding a comment below that you have signed it.
If the CLA check continues to fail, you can tag the @openedx/cla-problems team in a comment for further assistance.

🔘 Get a green build

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.

🔘 Let us know that your PR is ready for review:

Who will review my changes?

This repository is currently maintained by @2U-aperture. Tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for review.

Where can I find more information?

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

• Overview of Review Process for Community Contributions
• Pull Request Status Guide
• Making changes to your pull request

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

• The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
• The need for product review
• Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

[jsnwesson]

I went ahead and tested this, and it looks good so far. I provided a recording to show that keyboard and screenreader navigation are closer to working as they should (edit: I tried adding a screenrecording, but GitHub wasn't down to upload it), but this fix exposed another bug where for some reason the first announcement is about the passing grade for the bottom-most course. If you want to try to fix that in this PR, it'd be great, otherwise I think you can open another issue ticket to address it for future work.

Aside from that, I'll wait to approve this until some of the other failing tasks are addressed:

• you'll need to fix the lint errors that are noted by the linter
• ensure the CLA is signed and approved
• and I'm going to predict that a failing test will eventually be that the Jest Snapshot isn't going to pass with this new change. To update the Jest Snapshot, you can run npm run snapshot in your terminal and push the App.test.jsx.snap file to your PR.

Let me know if you have any questions!

[Ankush1oo8]

What is the lint error in the code

[jsnwesson]

@Ankush1oo8 you can find the lint errors by running npm run lint and fix it with npm run lint-fix, but you can also see them being flagged in GitHub by going to the file page

[jsnwesson]

And although it's not an actual blocker, if you can fix your commit message by following the OEP-51 document, that'll pass your first test.

[Ankush1oo8]

Okey 😁

[Ankush1oo8]

And although it's not an actual blocker, if you can fix your commit message by following the OEP-51 document, that'll pass your first test.

sir can you what is wrong in the new commit

[jsnwesson]

@Ankush1oo8 Ah! All that was missing is the : in between the tag and the commit message.

fix lint and format --> fix: lint and format

You had done it correctly before, but I think that you're still going to need to fill out the Contributor Agreement (CLA) if you haven't already. I'm not responsible for the CLA process, so I'm not sure if you already filled it out and are just waiting to be approved.

[Ankush1oo8]

I have filled it but did not receive any info about verification

[jsnwesson]

Ah! Then it could be that the person verifying it still needs to take a look at it 😄

One thing you can do while you wait is also make sure to update this branch with any new changes that occur from other Pull Requests. You can do that by clicking on the Update Branch button below.

[Ankush1oo8]

I have updated the branch

[jsnwesson]

@Ankush1oo8 I'm also looking into why the Node CI test is failing for an email notification, which I don't think has to do with your work. I've seen this in other PRs for this repo.

In the mean time, I think now you just need to wait on getting your CLA verified before this PR can be merged.

[itsjeyd]

@Ankush1oo8 It looks like commitlint is still reporting some issues. Could you please fix those? This comment should have the info that you'll need.

[Ankush1oo8]

@Ankush1oo8 It looks like commitlint is still reporting some issues. Could you please fix those? This comment should have the info that you'll need.

Can you check now I have made the change

[jsnwesson]

@Ankush1oo8 the commitlint will check all of your commits, so although some use the correct syntax (ie. fix: lint checks) you'll need to fix all of them to follow the commit syntax that I linked.

[Ankush1oo8]

So can I edit the commit messages