Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improving OSPR Management #134

Open
cassiezamparini opened this issue Oct 16, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Improving OSPR Management #134

cassiezamparini opened this issue Oct 16, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@cassiezamparini
Copy link

cassiezamparini commented Oct 16, 2024

See proposal

@antoviaque
Copy link

@xitij2000 @itsjeyd During the last meeting of the coordination working group, we set as a goal to have a plan for each of the approved proposals from the summit. It's likely going to be tricky to get things done with Christmas, but what would be your plan & timeline beyond that?

@itsjeyd
Copy link

itsjeyd commented Dec 9, 2024

@antoviaque This sprint I spent some time reviewing the scope of the proposal and scheduling tickets for implementing it. There are three different buckets of work, if you will:

  1. Documentation updates
    • Tickets ready to be worked on
    • Tentative completion date: Feb 28 2025
  2. Implementation of features and processes that are unique to this proposal
    • Tickets ready to be worked on
    • Tentative completion date: Apr 30 2025
  3. Implementation of features and processes that overlap with Single Responsible Person Principle (for bugs & PRs) #135 and Improve review process by using CODEOWNERS #140 fully or partially.
    • No tickets yet
    • Next step will be to have a conversation with @bradenmacdonald and @navinkarkera to see how we can combine the suggested approaches from the three proposals.

CC @xitij2000 @cassiezamparini

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Enhancement of CC Experience
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants