[PRE REVIEW]: superblockify: A Python Package for Automated Generation, Visualization, and Analysis of Potential Superblocks in Cities

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @cbueth (Carlson Büth)
Repository: https://github.com/NERDSITU/superblockify
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): submission
Version: 1.0.0
Editor: @crvernon
Reviewers: @erexer, @dinacmistry
Managing EiC: Olivia Guest

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/87426e988ebd0a6d7f592eb16d1fd209"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/87426e988ebd0a6d7f592eb16d1fd209/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/87426e988ebd0a6d7f592eb16d1fd209/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/87426e988ebd0a6d7f592eb16d1fd209)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @cbueth. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@cbueth if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=4.32 s (21.3 files/s, 336764.8 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
XML                              8              0              0        1429990
Python                          56           1770           4091           7955
YAML                             6             46             36           3432
Jupyter Notebook                10              0           4657           1875
TeX                              1             39              0            463
Markdown                         5            118              0            421
reStructuredText                 5             52             49            180
TOML                             1             21             16            121
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            92           2046           8849        1444437
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   634	Carlson Moses Büth
    43	cbueth
    19	Michael Szell
     8	Carlson B
     7	Carlson Büth
     1	Lint Action
     1	anvy

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1217

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

🟡 License found: GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 (Check here for OSI approval)

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

OK DOIs

- 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101486 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.10476253 is OK
- 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106111 is OK
- 10.3390/app13042095 is OK
- 10.1038/s41893-022-00855-2 is OK
- 10.1177/23998083221098739 is OK
- 10.1016/j.envres.2024.118550 is OK
- 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.05.004 is OK
- 10.1007/s41109-019-0189-1 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-030-12381-9_12 is OK
- 10.1016/j.socnet.2007.11.001 is OK
- 10.13140/RG.2.2.26204.36481 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.8009629 is OK
- 10.1038/s41467-018-04978-z is OK
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.198701 is OK
- 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105132 is OK
- 10.1007/978-3-319-74983-9_11 is OK
- 10.2905/9F06F36F-4B11-47EC-ABB0-4F8B7B1D72EA is OK
- 10.1177/0956247809344361 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.8087361 is OK
- 10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.103116 is OK
- 10.1038/s41598-022-10783-y is OK

MISSING DOIs

- 10.1136/bmj.n443 may be a valid DOI for title: Low traffic neighbourhoods and population health
- 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2024.103817 may be a valid DOI for title: Car harm: A global review of automobility’s harm t...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: TuneOurBlock
- No DOI given, and none found for title: QGIS
- No DOI given, and none found for title: QGIS Geographic Information System
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Potenziale von Superblock-Konzepten als Beitrag zu...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Walking and cycling: latest evidence to support po...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: BCNecologia: 20 años de la Agencia de Ecología Urb...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Exploring Network Structure, Dynamics, and Functio...
- 10.54337/aau451017237 may be a valid DOI for title: Points of Exchange: Spatial Strategies for the Tra...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: OpenStreetMap
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Urbanization
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Pilotstudie Supergrätzl - Ergebnisbericht Am Beisp...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Streetspace Guidance: Appendix Six (a): Supplement...

INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[cbueth]

Thank you for starting the pre review step.

We consider the following reviewers to have a suitable background and suggest them:

• lukasbeuster
• jkbren
• dinacmistry
• LCB0B
• jGaboardi
• tomalrussell

Also, we checked all bib entries without DOI and added them where possible, alternatively a url to the project page, to the updated submission branch. See commit NERDSITU/superblockify@ee498ee.

[cbueth]

The GitHub handles of my fellow co-authors are @anastassiavybornova and @mszell.

[cbueth]

@editorialbot generate preprint

[editorialbot]

📄 Preprint file created: Find it here in the Artifacts list 📄

[crvernon]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

👋 @cbueth - this one sounds fun! I am going to take it on as editor. We will get you to full review as soon as I can confirm some reviewers. Thanks for providing the recommendations!

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @crvernon is now the editor

[crvernon]

👋 @lukasbeuster - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[crvernon]

👋 @jkbren - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[crvernon]

👋 @dinacmistry - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[crvernon]

👋 @erexer - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

[crvernon]

@editorialbot add @erexer as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@erexer added to the reviewers list!

[dinacmistry]

Hi, Yes I can review the article. Cheers, Dina

…

On Fri, May 24, 2024, 8:12 AM Chris Vernon ***@***.***> wrote: 👋 @dinacmistry <https://github.com/dinacmistry> - Would you be willing to review this submission to JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#6666 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACDZPD5KHCAPPAG4RKOLOE3ZD4VBJAVCNFSM6AAAAABGUTGDXWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCMRZGM4DENZTGM> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[crvernon]

@editorialbot add @dinacmistry as reviewer

Thanks @dinacmistry!

[editorialbot]

@dinacmistry added to the reviewers list!

[crvernon]

@editorialbot start review

👋 - Alright @cbueth, @erexer, and @dinacmistry - I am going to close this Pre-Review and kick off the full review which you should receive a notification for. Thanks!

[erexer]

For sure!

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #6798.