Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Technical Report] Reward TermLinks #75

Closed
ccrock4t opened this issue Nov 16, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #92
Closed

[Technical Report] Reward TermLinks #75

ccrock4t opened this issue Nov 16, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #92
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ccrock4t
Copy link
Collaborator

ccrock4t commented Nov 16, 2023

Technical Report

Rule3: After each time a belief is used in inference, the term-link accessing it will be rewarded by a value r that is the maximum of the priority of the derived task (or the achieving level of the processed task). This reward can be considered as indicating the usefulness of the belief, and is used to increase the quality of the link from q to or(q, r), so the link will remain active longer. Another possibility is to relate q to the weighed average of the achieving levels of the tasks processed by the belief.

More Info

The Budgets of Beliefs are rewarded. I don't think TermLinks are rewarded. TermLink budgets are updated on line 395 of GeneralEngine.py, though it seems to follow a different procedure than described here.

@ccrock4t ccrock4t added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 16, 2023
@ccrock4t ccrock4t added enhancement New feature or request and removed bug Something isn't working labels Jan 17, 2024
@ccrock4t ccrock4t self-assigned this Jan 30, 2024
@ccrock4t ccrock4t linked a pull request Jan 30, 2024 that will close this issue
ccrock4t added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant