buyeruid name confusing in section "3.2.13: Object: User" (at least in version 2.3)

[tjk]

Haven't checked the other specs, but at least in 2.3 FINAL, there seems to be a typo -- it is unclear whether the User object contains a buyerid or buyeruid field (examples say one thing, table says another).

I've been told the actual field is buyeruid, but it would be nice to clean up the specification.

[MelissaIAB]

This was fixed in OpenRTB 2.3.1. http://www.iab.net/media/file/OpenRTB_API_Specification_Version_2_3_1.pdf

From: TJ Koblentz [mailto:notifications@github.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 1:51 PM
To: openrtb/OpenRTB OpenRTB@noreply.github.com
Subject: [OpenRTB] buyeruid name confusing in section "3.2.13: Object: User" (at least in version 2.3) (#19)

Haven't checked the other specs, but at least in 2.3 FINAL, there seems to be a typo -- it is unclear whether the User object contains a buyerid or buyeruid field (examples say one thing, table says another).

I've been told the actual field is buyeruid, but it would be nice to clean up the specification.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/19.

[tjk]

Go figure (might make sense to retroactively fix old spec documents?)! Thanks for the quick reply.

[tjk]

(I'm leaving this issue open only because I think old specifications should be correct, but feel free to close if you disagree)