You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
On some days there are many candidates containing only false positives (e.g. 20-40 candidates containing only Pigeon Guillemot bird calls). In such cases -- when the moderator is confident that no SRKW were present at the time and location of the false positives -- it would be able to "Select all" within a page view or a time interval, and then annotate that temporal batch of candidates with the same labels and comment.
To ensure high-quality annotation of acoustic bouts containing SRKW, each candidate in a bout should be processed separately, rather than in a batch. This would increase odds that every true positive is confirmed, false negatives are flagged, and that call types and "special" signals like whistles or buzzes will be annotated accurately.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
On some days there are many candidates containing only false positives (e.g. 20-40 candidates containing only Pigeon Guillemot bird calls). In such cases -- when the moderator is confident that no SRKW were present at the time and location of the false positives -- it would be able to "Select all" within a page view or a time interval, and then annotate that temporal batch of candidates with the same labels and comment.
To ensure high-quality annotation of acoustic bouts containing SRKW, each candidate in a bout should be processed separately, rather than in a batch. This would increase odds that every true positive is confirmed, false negatives are flagged, and that call types and "special" signals like whistles or buzzes will be annotated accurately.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: