[Feature request] 32-bit Docker images #1304
Replies: 1 comment
-
I have mixed feelings about this, so I did some tests to find out the difference between 32-Bit Valkey vs 64-Bit Valkey. Here is what I found:
Total memory used So, ~14.4% more memory efficient. On the surface, yeah, that extra 14.4% would be helpful for resource constrained situations. I haven't done a benchmark, my guess is they'd be pretty comparable, although I'd love to see something on a benchmark. What I'm a little more concerned about is what the project would need to maintain by issuing a 32-bit container. I'm not sure how much 32-bit Valkey is tested and the long-term outlook for 32-bit stuff is... grim. We're far beyond the days when 32-bit is needed to support any plausible, contemporary hardware. 64-bit is a far less constrained environment for a memory hungry application like Valkey; I feel like 32-bit containers would be used only by a handful of people and they are a non-trivial thing to maintain. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi all
I did some testing after reading the following in the docs and found a significant reduction in memory usage with 32-bit builds:
Is there any chance official 32-bit versions could be added to Docker Hub? I realise I can build them myself but official images would make maintenance a lot easier. The use case is caching - the majority of web apps don't need anything close to 4GB and the reduced memory footprint is a big help in resource constrained environments.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions