You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 16, 2022. It is now read-only.
Yea in practice, it might not be a huge problem for TWAP markets, since a 1% move sustained over a 10 min update period translates to a 1/6% move in the 1h TWAP value. So slippage here won't be super extreme, since dampened by the averaging.
For faster markets, it definitely becomes a problem. We'll want to make T+1 settlement super clear UI wise as well.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
When a user takes out a position, our t+1 architecture introduces a time period where the price can move from what they meant to lock in on.
What does this mean for price protection parameters? Are they important? Does Overlay require them?
Discuss.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: