Replicate primary appraisal for Sep 27 records

[pvzhelnov]

Greetings, dear contributor!

• This issue is a part of Zheln, an affiliation-free crowdfunded open-science initiative that aims to monitor, critically appraise, and tag with AMA specialties all new systematic reviews on PubMed.
• At first, I the founder intended to run Zheln all by myself. Later on, it turned out to be impossible because of an unsurmountable mismatch between the number of records and the time their processing took.
• This is why I’m now calling to the public. It remains to be seen how eventual collaboration on Zheln would look like, but now is just the time for piloting the system.
• So, to this end, I invite you to replicate the primary appraisal of the 67 records downloaded from PubMed on Sep 27 following exactly the procedure outlined in the readme.
• If anything is unclear to you, please feel free to contact me here on GitHub, via email, or on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, or Telegram.
• Thank you for considering this issue! ❤️

This issue was created and submitted to take part in Hacktoberfest. Even though this is not exactly about code, I believe the concept of open source in evidence synthesis is still applicable to this issue and did not find barriers precluding opt-in in the official guidance.

[pvzhelnov]

No one has showed up, whereas Hacktoberfest is over. 😢