You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For some reasons, I could not use kallisto on my data, and I rather had to use the aforementionned tools. I am now wondering whether I could still use sleuth on the output I have.
In particular
Do you so any strong reason to not try using sleuth on those outputs?
I think I would have to transform my read counts into estimated read counts similar to the ones given by kallisto - is there anyway to do this with the info I have ?
Thank you for reading me.
Edit: there were errors in the table I have; the output is in Read Count and not estimated counts (else I could directly use sleuth).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
lsoldini
changed the title
TPM's output from rpvg
Counts output from rpvg
Jul 8, 2022
Dear Patcher-lab,
I have used some pantranscriptomics tool to map RNA-seq reads on a pangenome graph, from this paper and that github.
The final output I have is a table giving read counts, effective length, as well as other features :
For some reasons, I could not use
kallisto
on my data, and I rather had to use the aforementionned tools. I am now wondering whether I could still usesleuth
on the output I have.In particular
Do you so any strong reason to not try using
sleuth
on those outputs?I think I would have to transform my read counts into estimated read counts similar to the ones given by
kallisto
- is there anyway to do this with the info I have ?Thank you for reading me.
Edit: there were errors in the table I have; the output is in Read Count and not estimated counts (else I could directly use
sleuth
).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: