Move paragrah around to fix hang in executive summary text

doc/executive-summary/executive-summary.rnw

@@ -736,7 +736,13 @@ distribution. Table~\ref{tab:es-decisions-biomass} shows projected relative
 spawning biomass outcomes and Table~\ref{tab:es-decisions-spr} shows projected
 fishing intensity outcomes relative to the target fishing intensity (based on
 SPR -- see table legend). Figure~\ref{fig:es-forecast-depletion-comparison} shows
-the projected biomass for several catch alternatives.
+the projected biomass for several catch alternatives. 
+
+A relative fishing intensity above 1 (or 100\% when shown as a percentage) indicates fishing greater than the
+$\Fforty$ default harvest rate catch target. This can happen for the median
+relative fishing intensity in projected years because the $\Fforty$ default
+harvest-rate catch limit is calculated using baseline selectivity from all
+years, whereas the forecasted catches are removed using selectivity
 %
 <<decisions.spr.table, results='asis', echo=FALSE>>=
 make.decision.table(base.model,
@@ -757,12 +763,7 @@ make.decision.table(base.model,
 
 \clearpage  % 2018: Then forces Table i and Fig j to be on same page, and j/k.
 
-A relative fishing intensity above 1 (or 100\% when shown as a percentage) indicates fishing greater than the
-$\Fforty$ default harvest rate catch target. This can happen for the median
-relative fishing intensity in projected years because the $\Fforty$ default
-harvest-rate catch limit is calculated using baseline selectivity from all
-years, whereas the forecasted catches are removed using selectivity averaged
-over the last five years. Recent changes in selectivity will thus be reflected
+ averaged over the last five years. Recent changes in selectivity will thus be reflected
 in the determination of fishing in excess of the default harvest
 policy. Alternative catch levels where median relative fishing intensity is
 100\% for three years of projections are provided for comparison (scenario f: