Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Recommend using promisify-child-process instead? #41

Open
jedwards1211 opened this issue May 30, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Recommend using promisify-child-process instead? #41

jedwards1211 opened this issue May 30, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@jedwards1211
Copy link

jedwards1211 commented May 30, 2018

Awhile ago I hurriedly rewrote this library to add some features and released it as promisify-child-process. Aside from impatience with making PRs and waiting for them to get merged, I wanted to:

  • Also promisify execFile and fork
  • Export the sync methods so that it can be a drop-in replacement for child_process
  • Include flow type defs
  • Have a full CI setup with semantic-release

I realize now that I created unfortunate fragmentation in the ecosystem and I should try to merge my code into this project (assuming you wouldn't prefer to deprecate this package in favor of mine).

What do you guys want me to do? The easiest thing would be making a PR that essentially replaces all code in this repo with mine (it would not cause any breaking changes to the API) but that might seem a bit heavy-handed.

@harrysarson
Copy link

Just to warn you @jedwards1211, I am not sure this repo is actively maintained at the moment.
I might be wrong but I haven't seen any activity here in a while. 😞

@jedwards1211
Copy link
Author

Oh okay. Maybe I should just start promoting mine as a replacement then?
https://github.com/jcoreio/promisify-child-process

@jedwards1211 jedwards1211 changed the title Merging with my promisify-child-process library? Recommend using promisify-child-process instead? May 30, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants