Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Table: Table scrolling for pf4 tables less performant than prior versions in openshift (virtualized tables) #8

Open
jcaianirh opened this issue Feb 25, 2021 · 6 comments

Comments

@jcaianirh
Copy link

Describe the issue. What is the expected and unexpected behavior?
Scrolling of pf4 tables is far less performant than the previous version
Specifically, pf4 tables vs pf3 tables scrolling is noticeably degraded. The PF4 table scrolling is choppy and jumpy by comparison.

This issue is reproducible with the Patternfly sample paes. The scrolling is re-rendering rows on every pixel movement. (See the screenshot attached) This re render did not occur on pf3 tables.

jumpytable

Please provide the steps to reproduce. Feel free to link CodeSandbox or another tool.

Is this a bug or enhancement? If this issue is a bug, is this issue blocking you or is there a work-around?
Bug
See:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1856355
patternfly/patternfly-react#4311 (filtering part of this bug was fixed)
What is your product and what release version are you targeting?
OpenShift 4.8

@tlabaj
Copy link
Contributor

tlabaj commented Mar 16, 2021

cc @jschuler

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 1, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix This will not be worked on label Jun 1, 2021
@spadgett
Copy link

spadgett commented Jun 1, 2021

Hi, this issue is still valid and impacts OpenShift.

@stale stale bot removed the wontfix This will not be worked on label Jun 1, 2021
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 31, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix This will not be worked on label Jul 31, 2021
@jcaianirh
Copy link
Author

Hi, this issue is still valid and impacts OpenShift.

@stale stale bot removed the wontfix This will not be worked on label Aug 2, 2021
@mcarrano
Copy link
Member

While we recognize the issue, we don't have an immediate solution. We are currently trying to add / identify a resource to pick up support for this extension. In the mean time we will keep this request in our backlog in hopes that we can address it in the not too distant future. @jcaianirh feel free to continue to check in about this.

cc @evwilkin @janwright73

@nicolethoen nicolethoen transferred this issue from patternfly/patternfly-react Apr 27, 2023
@jessiehuff jessiehuff moved this from Needs triage to Not started in PatternFly Extensions Oct 5, 2023
@dlabaj dlabaj moved this from Extensions to Backlog in PatternFly Issues Apr 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants