[TASK-6013] test PR #452
[TASK-6013] test PR #452
Conversation
…te-success feat(request): simpler create success screen
fix(request): allow route even if fees are less that a cent
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant modifications to two components: Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/components/Request/Create/Views/Success.view.tsx (2)
10-10: Consider providing more context in the success messageThe current success message "Yay!" is very generic. Consider providing a more informative message that gives context about what was successful, e.g., "Payment Request Created!" This would help users understand exactly what action has been completed.
Line range hint
7-29: Overall: Good simplification, but consider UX implicationsThe
SuccessViewcomponent has been significantly simplified, which generally improves code maintainability and focus. The reduction in props and the streamlined UI are positive changes. However, ensure that:
- The type definitions are updated to match the new prop structure.
- Users still have access to necessary payment details, either in this component or elsewhere in the application flow.
- The success message provides enough context for users to understand what action has been completed.
These considerations will help maintain a balance between code simplicity and user experience.
src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx (2)
Line range hint
1-524: Component structure and potential optimizationsWhile reviewing the entire component, I've noticed a few areas that could be improved:
Error Handling: The error handling is spread across multiple places in the component. Consider centralizing error handling to improve maintainability.
State Management: The component uses multiple state variables and contexts. Consider using a reducer to manage complex state logic more efficiently.
useEffect Dependencies: Some
useEffecthooks have large dependency arrays. Consider breaking these into smaller, more focused effects to improve performance and readability.Memoization: The component calculates several derived values. Consider using
useMemofor complex calculations to optimize performance.Here's an example of how you could use a reducer for state management:
type State = { viewState: ViewState; txFee: string; errorState: { showError: boolean; errorMessage: string }; // ... other state properties }; type Action = | { type: 'SET_VIEW_STATE'; payload: ViewState } | { type: 'SET_TX_FEE'; payload: string } | { type: 'SET_ERROR'; payload: { showError: boolean; errorMessage: string } } // ... other action types function reducer(state: State, action: Action): State { switch (action.type) { case 'SET_VIEW_STATE': return { ...state, viewState: action.payload }; case 'SET_TX_FEE': return { ...state, txFee: action.payload }; case 'SET_ERROR': return { ...state, errorState: action.payload }; // ... other cases default: return state; } } // In your component: const [state, dispatch] = useReducer(reducer, initialState); // Instead of setViewState(ViewState.READY_TO_PAY): dispatch({ type: 'SET_VIEW_STATE', payload: ViewState.READY_TO_PAY });This approach can help centralize state updates and make the component's logic easier to follow and maintain.
Line range hint
1-524: Summary and RecommendationsThe changes made to the
InitialViewcomponent, particularly in the fee estimation logic, have simplified the code and improved readability. However, there are several areas where the component could be further improved:
- Consider implementing the suggested check for zero fees to ensure proper error handling.
- Refactor the state management using a reducer pattern to centralize logic and improve maintainability.
- Break down large
useEffecthooks into smaller, more focused ones to improve performance and readability.- Utilize
useMemofor complex calculations to optimize performance.- Centralize error handling to make the code more robust and easier to maintain.
These changes would significantly improve the overall structure, performance, and maintainability of the component without altering its core functionality.
As a next step, consider creating a separate custom hook for handling the fee estimation logic. This would help to further separate concerns and make the main component more focused on rendering and user interactions.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- src/components/Request/Create/Views/Success.view.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx (8)
Learnt from: jjramirezn PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#422 File: src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx:76-78 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T20:13:44.480Z Learning: In `src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx`, both `txFee` and `utils.formatTokenAmount(estimatedGasCost, 3)` return strings, ensuring consistent return types for `calculatedFee`.Learnt from: jjramirezn PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#422 File: src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx:76-78 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T20:13:42.967Z Learning: In `src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx`, both `txFee` and `utils.formatTokenAmount(estimatedGasCost, 3)` return strings, ensuring consistent return types for `calculatedFee`.Learnt from: jjramirezn PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#422 File: src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx:76-78 Timestamp: 2024-10-07T15:28:25.280Z Learning: In `src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx`, both `txFee` and `utils.formatTokenAmount(estimatedGasCost, 3)` return strings, ensuring consistent return types for `calculatedFee`.Learnt from: jjramirezn PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#422 File: src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx:76-78 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T20:13:44.480Z Learning: In `src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx`, both `txFee` and `utils.formatTokenAmount(...)` return strings, ensuring that `calculatedFee` consistently returns a string without the need for additional type conversion.Learnt from: jjramirezn PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#422 File: src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx:76-78 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T20:13:42.967Z Learning: In `src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx`, both `txFee` and `utils.formatTokenAmount(...)` return strings, ensuring that `calculatedFee` consistently returns a string without the need for additional type conversion.Learnt from: jjramirezn PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#422 File: src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx:76-78 Timestamp: 2024-10-07T15:25:45.170Z Learning: In `src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx`, both `txFee` and `utils.formatTokenAmount(...)` return strings, ensuring that `calculatedFee` consistently returns a string without the need for additional type conversion.Learnt from: jjramirezn PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#410 File: src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx:87-93 Timestamp: 2024-10-08T20:13:42.967Z Learning: When refactoring to eliminate code duplication, prioritize readability and consider whether the change significantly improves the code. If it doesn't enhance readability or maintainability, it's acceptable to keep the existing code structure.Learnt from: jjramirezn PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#410 File: src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx:87-93 Timestamp: 2024-10-03T14:57:44.520Z Learning: When refactoring to eliminate code duplication, prioritize readability and consider whether the change significantly improves the code. If it doesn't enhance readability or maintainability, it's acceptable to keep the existing code structure.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/Request/Create/Views/Success.view.tsx (2)
13-15: LGTM: Improved clarity in explanation textThe explanation text for sharing the link has been modified to be more clear and concise. This change effectively communicates the functionality to the user.
9-15: Verify the impact of removed payment details on user experienceThe component has been significantly simplified, removing the display of detailed payment information (token amount, chain info, etc.). While this simplification can improve clarity, ensure that this information is readily available to users elsewhere in the flow if needed.
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for payment details display in other components # Test: Search for components that might display payment details rg --type typescript 'tokenValue|recipientAddress|selectedTokenPrice|inputDenomination|selectedChainID|selectedTokenAddress' -A 5
| const { selectedTokenPrice, inputDenomination, selectedChainID, selectedTokenAddress } = useContext( | ||
| context.tokenSelectorContext | ||
| ) | ||
| export const SuccessView = ({ link }: _consts.ICreateScreenProps) => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Update ICreateScreenProps to Reflect Simplified Props
The ICreateScreenProps interface in src/components/Request/Create/Create.consts.ts still includes props (onNext, onPrev, etc.) that are no longer used in the SuccessView component. Please update the type definition to include only the link prop or ensure you're using the correct interface.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify type definition for ICreateScreenProps
The component's props have been significantly reduced, which is a good simplification. However, ensure that the _consts.ICreateScreenProps type definition has been updated to reflect this change. If not, consider updating it to only include the link prop.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the definition of ICreateScreenProps
# Test: Search for the type definition
rg --type typescript 'interface ICreateScreenProps' -A 10
Length of output: 166
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Retry searching for ICreateScreenProps in .ts and .tsx files
# Search for the type definition in .ts and .tsx files
rg 'interface ICreateScreenProps' -g '*.ts*' -A 10
Length of output: 1876
| clearError() | ||
| setTxFee(Number(feeEstimation).toFixed(2)) | ||
| setViewState(ViewState.READY_TO_PAY) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplified transaction fee estimation logic
The changes have streamlined the fee estimation process by removing the conditional check for feeEstimation > 0. This simplification improves code readability and maintains the essential operations of clearing errors, setting the transaction fee, and updating the view state.
However, we should consider the following:
- The removal of the condition might lead to setting a zero fee in some cases. Verify if this aligns with the expected behavior.
- The unconditional setting of the view state to
READY_TO_PAYmight need to be reconsidered if there are scenarios where we don't want to proceed with zero fees.
Consider adding a simple check to ensure the fee is greater than zero before setting the view state:
clearError()
setTxFee(Number(feeEstimation).toFixed(2))
-setViewState(ViewState.READY_TO_PAY)
+setViewState(Number(feeEstimation) > 0 ? ViewState.READY_TO_PAY : ViewState.ERROR)This change would prevent proceeding with zero fees while maintaining the simplified logic.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
|
test comment |
|
assigning @Hugo0 |
No description provided.