-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[TASK-6795] feat(request): allow attachment download on receipt #531
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to three components: Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/components/Request/Pay/Views/GeneralViews/AlreadyPaid.view.tsx (2)
10-12
: Simplify chain lookup with optional chainingThe chain lookup can be simplified and made safer using optional chaining.
- const chainName = - consts.supportedPeanutChains && - consts.supportedPeanutChains.find((chain) => chain.chainId == requestLinkData?.chainId)?.name + const chainName = consts.supportedPeanutChains?.find( + (chain) => chain.chainId == requestLinkData?.chainId + )?.name🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 11-12: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
76-79
: Optimize chain details lookupThe chain lookup is duplicated from the earlier chainName calculation. Consider storing the chain details to avoid repeated lookups.
+ const chainDetails = consts.supportedPeanutChains?.find( + (detail) => detail.chainId === requestLinkData?.chainId + ); + const chainName = chainDetails?.name; // Later in the render... - src={ - consts.supportedPeanutChains.find( - (detail) => detail.chainId === requestLinkData?.chainId - )?.icon.url - } + src={chainDetails?.icon.url}src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Success.view.tsx (2)
98-99
: Add aria-label to download link for better accessibility.The download icon should have an aria-label to improve screen reader experience.
-<Icon name={'download'} /> +<Icon name={'download'} aria-label="Download attachment icon" />
Line range hint
13-182
: Consider splitting component responsibilities.The component handles multiple concerns (UI, transactions, storage, cross-chain). Consider:
- Extract transaction submission logic into a custom hook (e.g.,
useTransactionSubmission
)- Move local storage operations to a dedicated utility
- Create a separate component for transaction details section
This would improve maintainability and testability.
Would you like me to provide example implementations for any of these suggestions?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/components/Request/Pay/Views/GeneralViews/AlreadyPaid.view.tsx
(2 hunks)src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Success.view.tsx
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
src/components/Request/Pay/Views/GeneralViews/AlreadyPaid.view.tsx (3)
Learnt from: jjramirezn
PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#412
File: src/components/Request/Pay/Views/GeneralViews/AlreadyPaid.view.tsx:37-37
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T09:39:20.720Z
Learning: The files 'src/components/Claim/Generic/AlreadyClaimed.view.tsx' and 'NotFound.view.tsx' are part of the send flow, so the link text 'Make a payment yourself!' and href '/send' should remain as they are.
Learnt from: jjramirezn
PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#412
File: src/components/Request/Pay/Views/GeneralViews/AlreadyPaid.view.tsx:37-37
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T09:39:20.720Z
Learning: The files 'src/components/Claim/Generic/AlreadyClaimed.view.tsx' and 'NotFound.view.tsx' are part of the send flow, so the link text 'Make a payment yourself!' and href '/send' should remain as they are.
Learnt from: jjramirezn
PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#412
File: src/components/Request/Pay/Views/GeneralViews/AlreadyPaid.view.tsx:37-37
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T09:39:20.720Z
Learning: The files 'src/components/Claim/Generic/AlreadyClaimed.view.tsx' and 'NotFound.view.tsx' are part of the send flow, so the link text 'Make a payment yourself!' and href '/send' should remain as they are.
src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Success.view.tsx (3)
Learnt from: jjramirezn
PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#409
File: src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Success.view.tsx:23-23
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T09:39:20.720Z
Learning: In the `SuccessView` component, `transactionHash` remains constant because we are in a success view, so it's unnecessary to include it in the dependency array of `useEffect` hooks.
Learnt from: jjramirezn
PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#409
File: src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Success.view.tsx:23-23
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T09:39:20.720Z
Learning: In the `SuccessView` component, `transactionHash` remains constant because we are in a success view, so it's unnecessary to include it in the dependency array of `useEffect` hooks.
Learnt from: jjramirezn
PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#409
File: src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Success.view.tsx:23-23
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T09:39:20.720Z
Learning: In the `SuccessView` component, `transactionHash` remains constant because we are in a success view, so it's unnecessary to include it in the dependency array of `useEffect` hooks.
🪛 Biome
src/components/Request/Pay/Views/GeneralViews/AlreadyPaid.view.tsx
[error] 11-12: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
src/components/Request/Pay/Views/GeneralViews/AlreadyPaid.view.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
{requestLinkData!.attachmentUrl && ( | ||
<a | ||
href={requestLinkData!.attachmentUrl} | ||
download | ||
target="_blank" | ||
className="flex w-full cursor-pointer flex-row items-center justify-center gap-1 text-h9 font-normal text-gray-1 underline " | ||
> | ||
<Icon name={'download'} /> | ||
Download attachment | ||
</a> | ||
)} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Add rel="noopener noreferrer" to attachment download links
The codebase has multiple instances of attachment download links that need the security attribute. Here are the locations that need to be updated:
- src/components/Request/Pay/Views/GeneralViews/AlreadyPaid.view.tsx
- src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx
- src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Success.view.tsx
- src/components/Claim/Link/Initial.view.tsx
- src/components/Claim/Link/Onchain/Confirm.view.tsx
- src/components/Profile/Components/TableComponent.tsx
- src/components/Profile/Components/MobileTableComponent.tsx
- src/components/Dashboard/components/OptionsItemComponent.tsx
- src/components/Dashboard/components/MobileComponent.tsx
The attachmentUrl is properly typed as string | undefined in the interfaces and is handled safely with optional chaining in most places. However, the security concern about target="_blank" without rel="noopener noreferrer" is valid and should be addressed.
Regarding URL validation - while there isn't explicit URL validation for attachments, the attachmentUrl comes from trusted sources (interfaces and API responses) and is properly typed. The focus should be on adding the security attributes to the download links.
🔗 Analysis chain
Enhance security for attachment downloads
The attachment download functionality needs additional security considerations:
- The
target="_blank"
should includerel="noopener noreferrer"
for security - Consider validating the attachment URL format and implementing download size limits
- <a
- href={requestLinkData!.attachmentUrl}
- download
- target="_blank"
+ <a
+ href={requestLinkData?.attachmentUrl}
+ download
+ target="_blank"
+ rel="noopener noreferrer"
Let's verify the attachment URL handling:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for attachment URL validation in the codebase
rg -l "attachmentUrl.*validation|validateAttachment|sanitize.*url" --type ts
Length of output: 78
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for any attachment URL handling patterns in the codebase
rg -A 5 "attachmentUrl" --type ts
# Also search for any URL validation or sanitization utilities
rg -A 5 "validateUrl|sanitizeUrl|urlValidation" --type ts
# Look for any security-related utilities or hooks
rg -A 5 "useSecurity|useValidation|sanitize" --type ts
# Check if there's any type definition for requestLinkData
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
$$$
attachmentUrl
$$$
}'
Length of output: 28954
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add rel="noopener noreferrer" to attachment download links
Why is this necessary or a good security consideration?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Hugo0, adding rel="noopener noreferrer"
to links that use target="_blank"
is important for security reasons. When you open a link with target="_blank"
, the new page has access to the window.opener
object, which can lead to security vulnerabilities like reverse tabnabbing. This means the newly opened page could potentially manipulate the original page, such as redirecting it to a malicious site without the user's knowledge.
By adding rel="noopener noreferrer"
, you prevent the new page from accessing the window.opener
object, enhancing the security of your application.
Here's how you can update the link:
<a
href={requestLinkData!.attachmentUrl}
download
target="_blank"
rel="noopener noreferrer"
className="flex w-full cursor-pointer flex-row items-center justify-center gap-1 text-h9 font-normal text-gray-1 underline "
>
<Icon name={'download'} />
Download attachment
</a>
This ensures that users can download attachments safely without exposing your application to potential security risks.
<a | ||
href={requestLinkData!.attachmentUrl} | ||
download | ||
target="_blank" | ||
className="flex w-full cursor-pointer flex-row items-center justify-center gap-1 text-h9 font-normal text-gray-1 underline " |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add security attributes to external link.
When using target="_blank"
, always include rel="noopener noreferrer"
to prevent potential security vulnerabilities.
<a
href={requestLinkData!.attachmentUrl}
download
target="_blank"
+ rel="noopener noreferrer"
className="flex w-full cursor-pointer flex-row items-center justify-center gap-1 text-h9 font-normal text-gray-1 underline "
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
<a | |
href={requestLinkData!.attachmentUrl} | |
download | |
target="_blank" | |
className="flex w-full cursor-pointer flex-row items-center justify-center gap-1 text-h9 font-normal text-gray-1 underline " | |
<a | |
href={requestLinkData!.attachmentUrl} | |
download | |
target="_blank" | |
rel="noopener noreferrer" | |
className="flex w-full cursor-pointer flex-row items-center justify-center gap-1 text-h9 font-normal text-gray-1 underline " |
{requestLinkData!.attachmentUrl && ( | ||
<a | ||
href={requestLinkData!.attachmentUrl} | ||
download | ||
target="_blank" | ||
className="flex w-full cursor-pointer flex-row items-center justify-center gap-1 text-h9 font-normal text-gray-1 underline " | ||
> | ||
<Icon name={'download'} /> | ||
Download attachment | ||
</a> | ||
)} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Validate attachment URL before rendering.
Consider adding URL validation to prevent potential security issues from malicious URLs.
+const isValidUrl = (url: string) => {
+ try {
+ new URL(url);
+ return true;
+ } catch {
+ return false;
+ }
+};
-{requestLinkData!.attachmentUrl && (
+{requestLinkData!.attachmentUrl && isValidUrl(requestLinkData!.attachmentUrl) && (
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
{requestLinkData!.attachmentUrl && ( | |
<a | |
href={requestLinkData!.attachmentUrl} | |
download | |
target="_blank" | |
className="flex w-full cursor-pointer flex-row items-center justify-center gap-1 text-h9 font-normal text-gray-1 underline " | |
> | |
<Icon name={'download'} /> | |
Download attachment | |
</a> | |
)} | |
const isValidUrl = (url: string) => { | |
try { | |
new URL(url); | |
return true; | |
} catch { | |
return false; | |
} | |
}; | |
{requestLinkData!.attachmentUrl && isValidUrl(requestLinkData!.attachmentUrl) && ( | |
<a | |
href={requestLinkData!.attachmentUrl} | |
download | |
target="_blank" | |
className="flex w-full cursor-pointer flex-row items-center justify-center gap-1 text-h9 font-normal text-gray-1 underline " | |
> | |
<Icon name={'download'} /> | |
Download attachment | |
</a> | |
)} |
)} | ||
{requestLinkData!.attachmentUrl && ( | ||
<a | ||
href={requestLinkData!.attachmentUrl} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the code analysis, I can now provide a final response:
File attachment implementation needs additional validation
The current implementation lacks important security measures:
- No file size limits are enforced in the
FileUploadInput
component - Only basic image type validation is present (
checkifImageType
), but no validation for other file types - No server-side validation found in the attachment handling endpoints
The attachment feature could pose security risks without proper validation. Please add:
- Client and server-side file size limits
- Comprehensive file type validation
- Secure file upload validation in
/api/peanut/submit-claim-link/init
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify attachment handling implementation.
Please ensure that:
- The API endpoint properly handles attachment URLs
- There are appropriate file size limits
- Only allowed file formats can be uploaded
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for attachment handling implementation
# Check for API endpoint handling attachments
rg -A 5 "attachmentUrl|attachment" "src/api"
# Check for file size or format validation
rg -A 5 "maxFileSize|allowedFormats|validateFile" "src/"
Length of output: 149
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for attachment-related code
rg -A 5 "attachmentUrl|attachment" .
# Also search for file upload related code
rg -A 5 "upload|fileUpload|handleFile" .
# Search for API endpoints or services that might handle attachments
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_ {
$$$
attachment
$$$
}'
# Look for any file size or format validation
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = {
$$$
maxFileSize
$$$
}'
Length of output: 60852
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for file validation logic in the FileUploadInput component
rg -A 10 "handleFileChange" "src/components/Global/FileUploadInput"
# Search for any file type validation utilities
rg -A 5 "checkifImageType|validateFile" "src/utils"
# Look for any file size constants or configurations
rg "maxFileSize|MAX_FILE_SIZE|FILE_SIZE" .
Length of output: 2484
{requestLinkData!.attachmentUrl && ( | ||
<a | ||
href={requestLinkData!.attachmentUrl} | ||
download | ||
target="_blank" | ||
className="flex w-full cursor-pointer flex-row items-center justify-center gap-1 text-h9 font-normal text-gray-1 underline " | ||
> | ||
<Icon name={'download'} /> | ||
Download attachment | ||
</a> | ||
)} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add rel="noopener noreferrer" to attachment download links
Why is this necessary or a good security consideration?
return ( | ||
<div className="flex w-full flex-col items-center justify-center gap-6 py-2 pb-20 text-center"> | ||
{(requestLinkData?.reference || requestLinkData?.attachmentUrl) && ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
{(requestLinkData?.reference || requestLinkData?.attachmentUrl) && (
Comment
Q: Why do this? is it necessary? We already check for existence of both of these individually later
Q: I don't understand why this is necessary - didn't we already have this functionality before? When did it disappear? or did it only exist for claimLinks? Code suggestion: If we already have it for claimlinks, maybe it would make sense to standardize into one common reference/attachment component? |
We did not have this functionality, added new commit to standarize |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
src/components/Request/Components/ReferenceAndAttachment.tsx (3)
3-9
: Consider extracting props interfaceFor better maintainability and reusability, consider extracting the props interface:
+interface ReferenceAndAttachmentProps { + reference?: string | null + attachmentUrl?: string | null +} + -export const ReferenceAndAttachment = ({ - reference, - attachmentUrl, -}: { - reference?: string | null - attachmentUrl?: string | null -}) => { +export const ReferenceAndAttachment = ({ + reference, + attachmentUrl, +}: ReferenceAndAttachmentProps) => {
10-10
: Add explanatory comment for early returnConsider adding a comment to explain the early return condition for better code maintainability:
+ // Return null if no reference or attachment URL is provided if (!reference && !attachmentUrl) return null
3-34
: Add unit tests for the componentTo ensure reliability of this new shared component, consider adding unit tests covering:
- Rendering with different prop combinations
- URL validation
- Download functionality
Would you like me to help generate the test suite for this component?
src/components/Request/Pay/Views/GeneralViews/AlreadyPaid.view.tsx (2)
11-13
: Use optional chaining for safer chain name lookupThe chain name lookup can be simplified and made safer using optional chaining.
- const chainName = - consts.supportedPeanutChains && - consts.supportedPeanutChains.find((chain) => chain.chainId == requestLinkData?.chainId)?.name + const chainName = consts.supportedPeanutChains?.find( + (chain) => chain.chainId == requestLinkData?.chainId + )?.name🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 12-13: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
58-62
: Consider extracting the chain lookup logicThe chain lookup is duplicated between the chainName calculation and icon URL lookup. Consider extracting this into a reusable variable.
+ const selectedChain = consts.supportedPeanutChains?.find( + (detail) => detail.chainId === requestLinkData?.chainId + ) + const chainName = selectedChain?.name // ... <img - src={ - consts.supportedPeanutChains.find( - (detail) => detail.chainId === requestLinkData?.chainId - )?.icon.url - } + src={selectedChain?.icon.url} className="h-6 w-6" />
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
src/components/Request/Components/ReferenceAndAttachment.tsx
(1 hunks)src/components/Request/Pay/Views/GeneralViews/AlreadyPaid.view.tsx
(2 hunks)src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx
(2 hunks)src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Success.view.tsx
(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Success.view.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
src/components/Request/Pay/Views/GeneralViews/AlreadyPaid.view.tsx (3)
Learnt from: jjramirezn
PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#412
File: src/components/Request/Pay/Views/GeneralViews/AlreadyPaid.view.tsx:37-37
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T09:39:20.720Z
Learning: The files 'src/components/Claim/Generic/AlreadyClaimed.view.tsx' and 'NotFound.view.tsx' are part of the send flow, so the link text 'Make a payment yourself!' and href '/send' should remain as they are.
Learnt from: jjramirezn
PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#412
File: src/components/Request/Pay/Views/GeneralViews/AlreadyPaid.view.tsx:37-37
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T09:39:20.720Z
Learning: The files 'src/components/Claim/Generic/AlreadyClaimed.view.tsx' and 'NotFound.view.tsx' are part of the send flow, so the link text 'Make a payment yourself!' and href '/send' should remain as they are.
Learnt from: jjramirezn
PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#412
File: src/components/Request/Pay/Views/GeneralViews/AlreadyPaid.view.tsx:37-37
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T09:39:20.720Z
Learning: The files 'src/components/Claim/Generic/AlreadyClaimed.view.tsx' and 'NotFound.view.tsx' are part of the send flow, so the link text 'Make a payment yourself!' and href '/send' should remain as they are.
src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx (2)
Learnt from: jjramirezn
PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#410
File: src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx:87-93
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T09:39:20.720Z
Learning: When refactoring to eliminate code duplication, prioritize readability and consider whether the change significantly improves the code. If it doesn't enhance readability or maintainability, it's acceptable to keep the existing code structure.
Learnt from: jjramirezn
PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#410
File: src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx:87-93
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T09:39:20.720Z
Learning: When refactoring to eliminate code duplication, prioritize readability and consider whether the change significantly improves the code. If it doesn't enhance readability or maintainability, it's acceptable to keep the existing code structure.
🪛 Biome
src/components/Request/Pay/Views/GeneralViews/AlreadyPaid.view.tsx
[error] 12-13: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/components/Request/Components/ReferenceAndAttachment.tsx (1)
1-2
: Verify Icon component usage across the codebase
Let's ensure consistent usage of the Icon component across similar download functionality.
✅ Verification successful
Icon component usage is consistent across download functionality
The verification shows that the Icon component is consistently used across the codebase for download functionality. All instances use the same pattern:
- Same import path from '@/components/Global/Icon'
- Consistent usage with
name={'download'}
prop - Similar context within download links
Found in:
- src/components/Request/Components/ReferenceAndAttachment.tsx
- src/components/Create/Link/Confirm.view.tsx
- src/components/Claim/Link/Initial.view.tsx
- src/components/Claim/Link/Onchain/Confirm.view.tsx
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent Icon component usage with download functionality
# Look for other download links using the Icon component
rg -A 3 "Icon.*download" --type tsx
Length of output: 65
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Icon component usage in TypeScript and TypeScript React files
rg -A 3 "Icon.*download" --type ts --type tsx --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx'
# Also search for download-related Icon usage with different casing
rg -A 3 "Icon.*[Dd]ownload" --type ts --type tsx --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx'
# Find all files that import the Icon component
rg "import.*Icon.*from.*@/components/Global/Icon" --type ts --type tsx --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx'
Length of output: 6143
src/components/Request/Pay/Views/GeneralViews/AlreadyPaid.view.tsx (2)
8-8
: LGTM: Clean import of the new component
The import of ReferenceAndAttachment component aligns with the PR objective of adding attachment download functionality.
23-26
: LGTM: Clean implementation of ReferenceAndAttachment component
The component is properly integrated with correct prop passing using optional chaining.
src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx (2)
25-25
: LGTM!
Clean import of the new ReferenceAndAttachment component following standard React conventions.
325-328
: LGTM! Clean integration of attachment functionality
The ReferenceAndAttachment component is properly integrated with the required props from requestLinkData, enabling users to download attachments directly from receipts as intended.
Let's verify the component's implementation:
✅ Verification successful
ReferenceAndAttachment component implementation verified and approved
The component correctly:
- Accepts
reference
andattachmentUrl
props as optional strings - Renders a reference label when
reference
is provided - Implements attachment download via an anchor tag with proper attributes (
download
,target="_blank"
) - Uses appropriate styling and includes a download icon
- Gracefully handles cases where neither prop is provided by returning null
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the ReferenceAndAttachment component implementation
# Expected: Find the component definition and verify it handles attachments properly
# Check the component implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'export const ReferenceAndAttachment = ({ reference, attachmentUrl }: { reference?: string, attachmentUrl?: string }) => {
$$$
}'
# Look for any download-related functionality
rg -A 5 'download.*attachment' src/components/Request/Components/ReferenceAndAttachment
Length of output: 339
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first locate the ReferenceAndAttachment component file
fd ReferenceAndAttachment
# Then examine its implementation
rg -A 10 "ReferenceAndAttachment" --type tsx
# Look for download functionality with a broader search
rg -A 5 "download.*attachment" --type tsx
Length of output: 233
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Now that we found the file, let's examine its contents
cat src/components/Request/Components/ReferenceAndAttachment.tsx
# Also search for download functionality without file type restriction
rg -A 5 "download.*attachment"
Length of output: 1900
<a | ||
href={attachmentUrl} | ||
download | ||
target="_blank" | ||
className="flex w-full cursor-pointer flex-row items-center justify-center gap-1 text-h9 font-normal text-gray-1 underline " |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add security attributes and improve accessibility
The download link needs security attributes and accessibility improvements:
<a
href={attachmentUrl}
download
target="_blank"
+ rel="noopener noreferrer"
+ aria-label="Download attachment file"
className="flex w-full cursor-pointer flex-row items-center justify-center gap-1 text-h9 font-normal text-gray-1 underline "
>
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
<a | |
href={attachmentUrl} | |
download | |
target="_blank" | |
className="flex w-full cursor-pointer flex-row items-center justify-center gap-1 text-h9 font-normal text-gray-1 underline " | |
<a | |
href={attachmentUrl} | |
download | |
target="_blank" | |
rel="noopener noreferrer" | |
aria-label="Download attachment file" | |
className="flex w-full cursor-pointer flex-row items-center justify-center gap-1 text-h9 font-normal text-gray-1 underline " |
{attachmentUrl && ( | ||
<a | ||
href={attachmentUrl} | ||
download | ||
target="_blank" | ||
className="flex w-full cursor-pointer flex-row items-center justify-center gap-1 text-h9 font-normal text-gray-1 underline " | ||
> | ||
<Icon name={'download'} /> | ||
Download attachment | ||
</a> | ||
)} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Validate attachment URL before rendering
Consider adding URL validation before rendering the download link to prevent potential security issues:
- {attachmentUrl && (
+ {attachmentUrl && isValidUrl(attachmentUrl) && (
<a
href={attachmentUrl}
download
target="_blank"
rel="noopener noreferrer"
aria-label="Download attachment file"
className="flex w-full cursor-pointer flex-row items-center justify-center gap-1 text-h9 font-normal text-gray-1 underline "
>
<Icon name={'download'} />
Download attachment
</a>
)}
+// Add this utility function
+const isValidUrl = (url: string): boolean => {
+ try {
+ new URL(url);
+ return true;
+ } catch {
+ console.error('Invalid attachment URL provided');
+ return false;
+ }
+};
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
No description provided.