Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace make with snakemake, or something else? #300

Open
jpwgnr opened this issue Aug 28, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Replace make with snakemake, or something else? #300

jpwgnr opened this issue Aug 28, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@jpwgnr
Copy link

jpwgnr commented Aug 28, 2022

What is your opinion?

@chrbeckm
Copy link
Member

Too advanced for most of the participants, but nice addition to https://toolbox.pep-dortmund.org/links.html#make

@maxnoe
Copy link
Member

maxnoe commented Aug 28, 2022

Cmake doesn't really fit here. Snakemake is a good more modern, pythonic general tool but cmake is very specific to building c++ projects and not a replacement at all for make as we use it in the Workshop.

@jpwgnr
Copy link
Author

jpwgnr commented Aug 30, 2022

Yes, I like snakemake quite a lot as a replacement for make, especially because it is pythonic which fits well in the toolbox workshop.

Yes, cmake I would only mention. Could be nice to use in bigger projects in Computational Physics maybe, to get an idea. But nevermind.

Maybe in the future we could think about replacing make with snakemake in the workshop

@maxnoe maxnoe changed the title Snakemake and cmake mentioning in make slides? Replace make with snakemake, or something else? Nov 25, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants