Feat capture service worker resources #1434
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes:
bypass: false
forNetwork.setBypassServiceWorker
so that service-worker controller can be added and we can access the MSW mocks customer has added.serviceWorker
parameter, to handleRequests that are not intercepted (since service worker intercepted and will resolve them)ToDo:
Detailed Changes & Reasoning:
Network.setBypassServiceWorker
tobypass: false
so that we can add service-worker controller and access service worker that mocks customer's data.Network.getResponseBody
, but over herebody
is returned as""
(empty string) randomly.Network.getResponseBody
on the original request which service-worker intercepted.Network.getResponseBody
is same as what appears in theResponse
tab in Network section in devtools.Response
tab is always populated.body: ""
whenNetwork.getResponseBody
is called on it.Network.getResponseBody
on the original request itself.