RecFIN Utilities vs other data

[melissamonk-NOAA]

@kellijohnson-NOAA I think it may make sense to leave this as a RecFIN utilities repository and create a second Recreational Data repo for all of the recreational data sources that are not on RecFIN.

[kellijohnson-NOAA]

That sounds fine for right now if we want a separate repo to download and clean data. Then have a third that deals with models. We just have to be careful that code doesn't become duplicated, otherwise we would need to combine everything into one.

[melissamonk-NOAA]

Agreed.

…

On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 8:21 AM Kelli Johnson ***@***.***> wrote: That sounds fine for right now if we want a separate repo to download and clean data. Then have a third that deals with models. We just have to be careful that code doesn't become duplicated, otherwise we would need to combine everything into one. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#6 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAWRXM36YDKUKSI3D7QPZYDV35Z6TANCNFSM576XBLLA> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

-- *Melissa Monk, Ph.D. (she/her)* Fisheries Ecology Division National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 110 McAllister Way Santa Cruz, CA 95060 Phone: 831-420-3950