Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Additional data collected for indices #26

Open
kellijohnson-NOAA opened this issue Aug 27, 2020 · 6 comments
Open

Additional data collected for indices #26

kellijohnson-NOAA opened this issue Aug 27, 2020 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@kellijohnson-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor

kellijohnson-NOAA commented Aug 27, 2020

More survey data are available than what is currently used within VASTWestCoast. Surveys that were mentioned on 2020-08-25 include the following:

  • POP: @chantelwetzel-noaa has code for this and is fine with keeping it out of VASTWestCoast at the moment.
  • Fishery dependent
    • Recreational
    • Commercial
  • Hook and line
    • Southern California Shelf Rockfish Hook and Line Survey to establish an annual index of abundance for key species of structure-associated shelf rockfish (Sebastes) within the Southern California Bight since 2004 at 121 fixed stations (Harms, Wallace, and Stewart, 2010). Thorson et al. (2015) used the data set for three species, though they were interested in density dependence. @Curt-Whitmire-NOAA will be a great resource for setting this survey up in VASTWestCoast
    • IPHC
@kellijohnson-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mhaltuch can you list some surveys here that come to mind when you think about DFO and Alaska data that could help inform US West Coast species? I am guessing that this information could be helpful for species beyond hake and sablefish.

@iantaylor-NOAA
Copy link

Years ago @James-Thorson and Robyn Forrest were working on a project looking across regions which Jim described as follows:

integrating bottom-trawl data from non-overlapping designs, e.g.: California Current (triennial + shelf-slope), BC (many programs), Gulf of Alaska, and Eastern Bering Sea using what I call "calibration by proximity" (the assumption that survey boundaries are statistically independent of underlying biological variation)

but I don't know if it went anywhere (I don't see anything on Google Scholar).

@James-Thorson
Copy link
Contributor

James-Thorson commented Sep 2, 2020 via email

@mhaltuch
Copy link

mhaltuch commented Sep 3, 2020 via email

@mhaltuch
Copy link

mhaltuch commented Sep 3, 2020 via email

@James-Thorson
Copy link
Contributor

James-Thorson commented Sep 3, 2020 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants