Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
244 lines (182 loc) · 10 KB

README.md

File metadata and controls

244 lines (182 loc) · 10 KB

Compile and execute CoBOL with GraalVM Community Edition and GnuCOBOL

GraalVM the polyglot Virtual Machine by Oracle

The GraalVM supports various languages, Java, JavaScript, Ruby, Python, R, WebAssembly, C/C++1. In another document, Oracle explains the VM can be an interpreter from native codes using compiler called a Low-Level Virtual Machine (LLVM)2. Those native codes being C, C++, FORTRAN, Rust, COBOL, and Go. It is now getting even more exiting! As a former mainframe/CoBOL developer, I would like to see those billions lines of CoBOL modernized in a more open environments.

CoBOL modernization

This article's goal is to explain how the GraalVM could be running CoBOL on pretty much any platform without package manager, only with the GraalVM and its LLVM package. IT departments, mainly in financial institutions and governments are desperately seeking CoBOL and mainframe experts but the lack of training course and the repelling Z/OS TSO environment are not encouraging vocations. Another major issue with those technologies resides in the costs of mainframe licenses. I think, hope, both could be solved porting existing CoBOL in modern environments. In case you don't know, rewriting the code and just shutting down the mainframes is not an option, see this great article.

Native code in GraalVM

If not already installed, GraalVM installation is described on their website. Executing native code require a GraalVM package call llvm-toolchain. On my system I already have clang and lli so I created symlinks g-clang and g-lli. I prefer to create a symlink with a different name for clang and lli executables rather than extending the path which will required the use of update-alternatives. A great medium post from an Oracle collaborator detail the GraalVM llvm-toolchain. The installation gives the following LLVM version:

chrichri@chrichri-x470aorusultragaming:~/cobinatcci$ g-lli --version
LLVM (http://llvm.org/):
  LLVM version 10.0.0-4-g22d2637565-bg83994d0b4b
  Optimized build.
  Default target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
  Host CPU: znver1

GnuCOBOL

Using Flex for lexical parsing and Bison a compiler-compiler, GnuCOBOL can transpile CoBOL to C. It can directly compile CoBOL to an executable using your platform toolchain but it is not our goal here, as we want to execute it with GraalVM. There are many CoBOL compilers out there. This one implement major part of CoBOL 1985, 2002 and several extensions of other compilers3. This compiler and its library libcob can easily be compiled with formerly installed GraalVM Compiler. The latest release of the code can be found on their official SourceForge site. Auto configure the build with the provided shell script:

sh ./autogen.sh

Configure the built with the GraalVM Clang compiler (and no Berkeley DB support in our example):

./configure --with-cc=g-clang --without-db

Build and install as usual:

make install

The installation gives me the following GNU CoBOL version:

chrichri@chrichri-x470aorusultragaming:~/cobinatcci/gnucobol-code-r4210-tags-gnucobol-3.1.2$ cobc --version
cobc (GnuCOBOL) 3.1.2.0
Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <https://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Written by Keisuke Nishida, Roger While, Ron Norman, Simon Sobisch, Edward Hart
Built     Mar 07 2021 21:44:51
Packaged  Mar 07 2021 20:31:04 UTC
C version "9.3.0"

Compiling CoBOL C intermediate, LLVM intermediate representation and its execution

Let's use the Mandelbrot set implemented in CoBOL as an example, see mandelbrotset.cbl:

identification division.
program-id. MandelbrotSet.

data division.
working-storage section.
01 ResolutionX             constant 240.
01 ResolutionY             constant 100.
01 RealPlaneMin            constant -2.5.
01 RealPlaneMax            constant 0.8.
01 ImaginaryPlaneMin    constant -1.25.
01 ImaginaryPlaneMax    constant 1.25.
01 ProportionalX           pic S99V9(16) usage comp-5 value zeros.
01 ProportionalY           pic S99V9(16) usage comp-5 value zeros.
01 IterationsMax           constant 60.
01 Threshold               constant 10000.

01 ScreenX                    pic 999 usage comp-5.
01 ScreenY                    pic 999 usage comp-5.
01 MathPlaneX              pic S99V9(16) usage comp-5.
01 MathPlaneY              pic S99V9(16) usage comp-5.

01 PointX                     pic S9(7)V9(8) usage comp-5.
01 PointY                     pic S9(7)V9(8) usage comp-5.
01 XSquared                pic S9(10)V9(8) usage comp-5.
01 YSquared                pic S9(10)V9(8) usage comp-5.
01 Iteration               pic 999 value zero.
01 TempVar                    pic S9(5)V9(8) usage comp-5.

procedure division.

compute ProportionalX = (RealPlaneMax - RealPlaneMin) /
    (ResolutionX - 1)
compute ProportionalY = (ImaginaryPlaneMax - ImaginaryPlaneMin) /
    (ResolutionY - 1)

perform varying ScreenY from 0 by 1 until ScreenY is equal to
    ResolutionY

    compute MathPlaneY = ImaginaryPlaneMin +
           (ProportionalY * ScreenY)

    perform varying ScreenX from 0 by 1 until ScreenX is equal to
           ResolutionX

           compute MathPlaneX = RealPlaneMin +
               (ProportionalX * ScreenX)

           move zero to PointX
           move zero to PointY
           multiply PointX by PointX giving XSquared
           multiply PointY by PointY giving YSquared

           perform with test after varying Iteration from 0 by 1
               until Iteration >= IterationsMax or
                        XSquared + YSquared >= Threshold
                    compute TempVar = XSquared - YSquared + MathPlaneX
                    compute PointY = 2 * PointX * PointY + MathPlaneY
                    move TempVar to PointX
                    compute XSquared = PointX * PointX
                    compute YSquared = PointY * PointY
           end-perform

           if Iteration is equal to IterationsMax
               display "*" with no advancing
           else
               display " " with no advancing
           end-if
    end-perform

    display " "

end-perform
stop run.
end program MandelbrotSet.

Producing the C intermediate

Using GnuCOBOL, the C intermediate can be produced with the following command:

cobc -C -x mandelbrotset.cbl

The project should look like:

benchmark
├── bin
├── mandelbrotset.c
├── mandelbrotset.c.h
├── mandelbrotset.c.l.h
└── mandelbrotset.cbl

Compiling C to LLVM Intermediate Reprensentation

One point not completely clear from their documentation is the benefit of LLVM and how to execute code in GraalVM not just creating a binary like GNU CoBOL easily does. Using Clang to directly compile CoBOL into a executable is possible if you don't forget to include the libcob dependency with -lcob. But the real benefit of LLVM comes from the Intermediate Representation (IR) code that can run or compile on any platform running LLVM or in this case GraalVM LLVM.

Compiling to IR command is:

g-clang mandelbrotset.c -S -emit-llvm -o "bin/mandelbrotset.ll"

The project should look like:

benchmark
├── bin
│   └── mandelbrotset.ll
├── mandelbrotset.c
├── mandelbrotset.c.h
├── mandelbrotset.c.l.h
└── mandelbrotset.cbl

Execution in the LLVM interpreter

The LLVM interpreter lli command can run the IR loading the libcob dependency:

g-lli -load /usr/local/lib/libcob.so ./bin/mandelbrotset.ll

comparison with the regular LLVM

The same version of LLVM can be downloaded from their github repository, under the llvmorg-10.0.0 tag. It was compiled using Ninja, with the assertions disabled, as a release to get the same build as the GraalVm one. The compiling command is therefore:

mkdir build
cmake -GNinja ../llvm -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=off
ninja

This give a similar LLVM interpreter as the GraalVM one:

chrichri@chrichri-x470aorusultragaming:~/cobinatcci$ lli --version
LLVM (http://llvm.org/):
  LLVM version 10.0.0
  Optimized build.
  Default target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
  Host CPU: znver1

The previously generated IR code can be run with this LLVM interpreter:

lli -load /usr/local/lib/libcob.so ./bin/mandelbrotset.ll

Execution time with both LLVM interpreter is similar:

mandelbrotset>
LLVM ***************************************************************

real    0m0.356s
user    0m0.352s
sys     0m0.007s
GRAAL LLVM *********************************************************

real    0m0.371s
user    0m0.335s
sys     0m0.014s

Other programs indicated the GraalVM LLVM interpreter is always slightly slower. 1.39 slower in the worst case found with a program computing the first 1899 prime numbers. See the corresponding github repository for more details on this benchmark. Christophe Brun, https://www.papit.fr/

Footnotes

  1. https://www.graalvm.org/docs/why-graal/

  2. https://www.graalvm.org/uploads/graalvm-language-level-virtualization-oracle-tech-papers.pdf

  3. https://sourceforge.net/projects/gnucobol/