Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Get order "editing" working fully
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Turns out the EMS can support this as originally expected: you can
update a `brokerd`-side `.reqid` through a `BrokerdAck` msg and the ems
which update its cross-dialog (leg) tracking correctly! The issue was
a bug in the `editOrderStatus` msg handling and appropriate tracking
of the correct `.oid` (ems uid) on the kraken side. This unfortunately
required adding a `emsflow: dict[str, list[BrokerdOrder]]` msg flow
tracing table which means the broker daemon is tracking all the msg flow
with the ems, though I'm wondering now if this is just good practise
anyway and maybe we should offer a small primitive type from our msging
utils to aid with this? I've used such constructs in event handling
systems prior.

There's a lot more factoring that can be done after these changes as
well but the quick detailed summary is,
- rework the `handle_order_requests()` loop to use `match:` syntax and
  update the new `emsflow` table on every new request from the ems.
- fix the `editOrderStatus` case pattern to not include an error msg and
  thus actually be triggered to respond to the ems with a `BrokerdAck`
  containing the new `.reqid`, the new kraken side `txid`.
- skip any `openOrders` msgs which are detected as being kraken's
  internal order "edits" by matching on the `cancel_reason` field.
- update the `emsflow` table in all ws-stream msg handling blocks
  with responses sent to the ems.

Relates to #290
  • Loading branch information
goodboy committed Jul 19, 2022
1 parent 0c34dc4 commit 7e040af
Showing 1 changed file with 172 additions and 154 deletions.
Loading

0 comments on commit 7e040af

Please sign in to comment.