Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

contradictory duplicates - 7469530BFF9AB876FFFC4759790E0F53 #388

Open
camiplata opened this issue Feb 10, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

contradictory duplicates - 7469530BFF9AB876FFFC4759790E0F53 #388

camiplata opened this issue Feb 10, 2025 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
fix request A fix requested for a specific paper or treatment

Comments

@camiplata
Copy link

https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/summary/7469530BFF9AB876FFFC4759790E0F53

This dataset has several duplicates, and many of them contradict each other:

For example the exact same names is both marked as accepted an synonym:

Image Image

Duplicated genus under different families:

Image

Exact same synonym name with multiple accepted names

Image

The above screenshots are only examples of the issues found, please see the duplicates tab on CLB for the entire list.

I'll block this dataset from the xrelease for now as it is suspiciously adding 280+ names, I'll have to check the merge names in detail.

@flsimoes flsimoes self-assigned this Feb 11, 2025
@flsimoes flsimoes added the fix request A fix requested for a specific paper or treatment label Feb 11, 2025
@flsimoes
Copy link

@camiplata This is a very complex document

Please do block it from xrelease. It will require extensive quality control (would probably take someone a whole week of full time work).

While trying to understand what's going on, I've fixed the first example, which had a "non" citation, which means it isn't a proper treatmentCitation.

As for the second example. The treatment for Cyrtodactylus consobrinus has C. pulchellus in its synonymy, so that's alright. Trouble is, the authors provided treatments for "erroneous" species (see screenshot below). I'm left to wonder what I should do in this regard... My first thought is to remove these as treatments as individual units and add them as part of the valid species' treatment...

Image

@camiplata
Copy link
Author

Thanks Felipe, this one is indeed a tricky one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
fix request A fix requested for a specific paper or treatment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants