You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Please do block it from xrelease. It will require extensive quality control (would probably take someone a whole week of full time work).
While trying to understand what's going on, I've fixed the first example, which had a "non" citation, which means it isn't a proper treatmentCitation.
As for the second example. The treatment for Cyrtodactylus consobrinus has C. pulchellus in its synonymy, so that's alright. Trouble is, the authors provided treatments for "erroneous" species (see screenshot below). I'm left to wonder what I should do in this regard... My first thought is to remove these as treatments as individual units and add them as part of the valid species' treatment...
https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/summary/7469530BFF9AB876FFFC4759790E0F53
This dataset has several duplicates, and many of them contradict each other:
For example the exact same names is both marked as accepted an synonym:
Duplicated genus under different families:
Exact same synonym name with multiple accepted names
The above screenshots are only examples of the issues found, please see the duplicates tab on CLB for the entire list.
I'll block this dataset from the xrelease for now as it is suspiciously adding 280+ names, I'll have to check the merge names in detail.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: