Treatment "Ites colasi Lepesme 1943" // problem linked to verbatim?

[TG-De-EJT]

Good morning,

I'm opening this issue following comment from one of ejt's desk editors who has noticed some problems with the following article: https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/summary/D90FFFECFFFBEE0AFFB7FFC21D6F247E
In this specific treatment, it seems some specimens are counted twic,e maybe an error caused by the verbatim? but there is some others were the the data are are also incorrect.

Here is the corresponding dataset with some annotations:

EJT_869_2023_Cerambycidae_data_GBIF.xlsx

Many specimens that should be under Zographus regalis poleti are filed under Leucographus catalai (in red)
In orange, some specimens are counted twice and don't match the number of individuals given by the author.
Some specimens are not labelled as paratypes, e.g., ZMH 843018
Specimens of Zographus regalis dyoti, Zographus regalis lualabenis, Hoplideres spinipennis nitidior are missing from dataset
Countries of specimens of Zographus regalis boni are incorrect: it seems the country was not taken form the beginning of paragraph, but from the verbatim historic data:

• the localities are all now in Central African Republic.
• moreover, the data "Congo français" was apparently wrongly interpreted as "Democratic Republic of Congo", but "Democratic Republic of Congo" corresponds in fact to the old "Congo Belge".

Context
Treatment: Ites colasi Lepesme 1943 - 25368794FFF9EE08FDC8FBC41E83221A - go to page
Document: ejt-869_1-50.pdf - D90FFFECFFFBEE0AFFB7FFC21D6F247E - go to summary

Thanks in advance,

TG