You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Would be great to be able to support equations of the form M'(t) = f(M(t)) where $M$ is an arbitrarily-shaped array (e.g., a matrix) and not necessarily a (n,)-shaped array.
Why?
This is super useful when solving for instance partial differential equations and has come up recently in #452.
Context
While we can always "flatten" the equation, it is not just easier to use the code if flattening isn't necessary, but matrix-valued equations also motivate a different state-space model and maybe we can improve efficiency here.
Other
Stretch goal: solve equations where the state is an arbitrary pytree. It is not obvious, however, what the state-space model should be for an arbitrary pytree so this stretch goal is likely out of scope.
Related
If #288 can be realised successfully, we get matrix-valued differential equations for free. See also #296, which "goes the other way" (i.e. demanding solvers for ndim-0 arrays instead of ndim-1 arrays).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What?
Would be great to be able to support equations of the form M'(t) = f(M(t)) where$M$ is an arbitrarily-shaped array (e.g., a matrix) and not necessarily a (n,)-shaped array.
Why?
This is super useful when solving for instance partial differential equations and has come up recently in #452.
Context
While we can always "flatten" the equation, it is not just easier to use the code if flattening isn't necessary, but matrix-valued equations also motivate a different state-space model and maybe we can improve efficiency here.
Other
Stretch goal: solve equations where the state is an arbitrary pytree. It is not obvious, however, what the state-space model should be for an arbitrary pytree so this stretch goal is likely out of scope.
Related
If #288 can be realised successfully, we get matrix-valued differential equations for free. See also #296, which "goes the other way" (i.e. demanding solvers for ndim-0 arrays instead of ndim-1 arrays).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: