-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Timestamp Receipts — Add Timestamp to Anchor #178
Comments
@lautarodragan I agree with your recommendation. I am putting this in the Mainnet-beta milestone; let me know if you think it should be pushed back into a later release. |
@lautarodragan @kennylavender Has this task been covered with the recent claim batch work you completed? I read the links in the description at the top and it seems that it has been achieved, but want to double-check this with you before we consider this task closed. |
@geoffturk I don’t think so. We still need to address this. |
If we store a hash of the work in a work claim, and that claim is part of a batch, and that batch is hashed on the Bitcoin blockchain (IPFS directory hash is a merkle root of the directory content hashes) -- is that not all the proof we need? A chainpoint receipt as a JSON-LD document that contains everything you need to prove that a given hash is part of the merkle tree that was hashed to the blockchain, but do we need to provide chainpoint-style receipts? IMO, they're maybe useful for offline validation of certificates, but wouldn't you still need to confirm that the hash in question is indeed part of a blockchain block? So is there really such thing as true offline validation? All we really need is to include a deterministically reproducible hash of the contents we want to anchor in a claim. To verify that anchor is valid for a given document:
By following those steps, anybody can independently verify with cryptographic proof that the file and corresponding claim existed at the time the Bitcoin block was mined. |
@ericelliott that's what I call Solution 1, but it has some complications as stated above. |
Fine to leave in here for now, but not actively going to do anything here until Q1. |
OK. Potential candidate for PML2 milestone when we start it. |
Moving to planned, priority tbd with @wdavidturner |
We need to support Timestamp Receipts.
RDD: https://github.com/poetapp/documentation/blob/master/rdd/timestamp-receipts.md
Implementation TBD. Could be implemented in poet-node, as well as a separate project. Could run as a script, functions or an API.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: