Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Looking for a new maintainer #49

Open
rcoedo opened this issue Nov 12, 2018 · 9 comments
Open

Looking for a new maintainer #49

rcoedo opened this issue Nov 12, 2018 · 9 comments

Comments

@rcoedo
Copy link

rcoedo commented Nov 12, 2018

I'm not having the time to properly maintain this repository anymore. If anyone with enough experience wants to take over I would be happy to hand over the baton 😃

@jscheid I've seen that you're doing a new prettier package for emacs, are you interested in becoming the new maintainer here?

@jlongster I'm mentioning you since this may interest you.

@jscheid
Copy link
Contributor

jscheid commented Nov 12, 2018

Sorry but I'll pass. I'm planning to maintain the other package, but maintaining both seems a bit much (and somewhat redundant). Thanks for all your work on this one though.

@rcoedo
Copy link
Author

rcoedo commented Nov 13, 2018

Fair enough. Good luck with your package!

@jscheid
Copy link
Contributor

jscheid commented Nov 27, 2018

Thanks @rcoedo, that's very kind.

One question, I'm thinking of pushing my package to MELPA some time soon. Do you (or anybody else) mind if I'm using the generic package name prettier? I don't want it to look more "official" than your package, at the same time it is a full interface to Prettier and nothing else. Slapping on some random suffix might give people the idea that it isn't -- and frankly, I'm having trouble coming up with another name. What do you think?

@rcoedo
Copy link
Author

rcoedo commented Nov 28, 2018

@jscheid This is really not my package. I only published it to MELPA and maintained it with minor bug fixes and merging other people's patches. The package is the official one from the prettier organisation that once lived in the main prettier repository.

I think it would be nice for the emacs package ecosystem to try to avoid the confusing situation that we have with the javascript packages, where we have a js-mode, js2-mode, js3-mode and nobody knows what to use.

If I were you I think I'd try to contact somebody from the prettier organisation. If this package is unmaintained but you commit to maintain yours it probably makes sense to officially point people out to your package instead. In this case you could even take the current prettier-js package name (we could write a migration guide).

If I find the time I'd be glad to help you with bug fixes or minor stuff 😄

@jscheid
Copy link
Contributor

jscheid commented Nov 28, 2018

Thanks, yes that all makes sense, I'll try and reach out.

(I'm not keen to recycle the name prettier-js because it's misleading now that Prettier supports other languages. Also, my package uses a different license.)

@rcoedo
Copy link
Author

rcoedo commented Nov 28, 2018

Yes, you are right about that, with multiple language support prettier is probably a better name. If you get a response, please, let me know how it goes.

Cheers!

@jscheid
Copy link
Contributor

jscheid commented Jul 4, 2020

@rcoedo it now got accepted on MELPA with package name prettier, which @jlongster thought was fine. Thanks again for all your work on this one.

@jcs090218
Copy link

@rcoedo Hi, does this repo still need a maintainer? I think I could afford some maintenance in my spare time. I wonder what would be the qualification to become a maintainer to this package? Thanks!

@david-alvarez-rosa
Copy link

david-alvarez-rosa commented May 29, 2023

Any updates on this? I do have some bandwidth and could help if needed :)

Is this package in path of deprecation, though?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants