Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Vendor vs Maintainer vs ??? #14

Open
larsks opened this issue May 16, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Vendor vs Maintainer vs ??? #14

larsks opened this issue May 16, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@larsks
Copy link

larsks commented May 16, 2015

Docker images have a "maintainer" field, and this spec introduces a "Vendor" label. What's the difference? Is one an individual while one is an organization? Should it be an email address, a URL, or is the format unspecified?

@rhatdan
Copy link
Member

rhatdan commented May 16, 2015

I can see that problem, But maintainer tends to be Daniel Walsh, where is the Vendor is Red Hat. I think tools displaying this content should just ignore the Maintainer field. Since I think most users of containers currently do ignore it.

Having labels get out of date/wrong because of layers is not something we can solve here other then tell users to use best practices.

@llunved
Copy link

llunved commented Jun 16, 2015

I think we should specify that Vendor should be the organization 'owning' the image.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants