-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Google+ Implemention #64
Comments
google+ auth codes is supported by the code. You can do 2016-01-23 1:21 GMT+02:00 Zephyr Vi Britannia [email protected]:
|
Pulviscriptor please find a way to implement google+! |
@pulviscriptor I have already attempted by looking at web requests to look for the auth key but I couldn't find it. At least tell us what requested url has the auth key? |
@Zephyr-Vi |
Relevent parts on agar.io script : (function(a) {
== g.context; f.attachClickHandler(document.getElementById("gplusLogin"), {}, function(a) More info about G+ api : Le sam. 23 janv. 2016 à 11:31, pulviscriptor [email protected] a
|
I figured out how to do it myself. :P |
Could you contribute and share the code so we can expand agario client script |
@Zephyr-Vi |
@pulviscriptor Could that url help? |
@pulviscriptor This might be the solution for G+, |
@hassanila97 |
@pulviscriptor First we have to load the client_id and login_hint which is used in the request to get our agario token.
This url seems to be static which gives you a static "login_hint" but the "client_id" seems to change. The cookies sent it the request doesn't seem to effect it which believes me to think it is unneeded. Which returns a html format:
I did more research by looking into the code and the token used is called "access_token":
No problem for me doing this. ;) |
Great work |
@pulviscriptor Szammi, henopied and I finally finished our google plus token finder(Couldnt think of the right word for it). I have no idea how to use github so henopied is working on adding it in a pull request |
@DaAwesomeRazor |
@DaAwesomeRazor No credits for me figuring out the requests? 👎 |
Could you implement google+ as well?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: