Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tied aid status #25

Open
markbrough opened this issue Jan 22, 2014 · 2 comments
Open

Tied aid status #25

markbrough opened this issue Jan 22, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

@markbrough
Copy link
Member

Description
The tied aid status shows whether the organisation states that this activity counts as “tied” (procurement is restricted to the donor organisation country) or “untied” (open procurement). This can be either at the activity or transaction level, and is only expected if the activity is at least in the implementation phase.

2013 Index tests

default-tied-status or transaction/tied-status exists (if activity-status/@code is at least 2)?

Issues

No issues have been identified.

Questions

  1. Should the code of a tied-status have to conform to the IATI tied status codelist?

2014 Index test
We are not planning to change this test in 2014, unless feedback suggests there is a strong case for doing so.

@YohannaLoucheur
Copy link

As we have indicated before, the IATI standard does not conform with the DAC CRS way of reporting the tied status (which requires to report a value, not an all-or-nothing status). Canada, and presumably other donors, is not able to report this status in line with the current IATI standard.
There isn't really a short-term solution to this problem for the Index, but I thought I should flag it again, given the "No issues have been identified" statement.

@markbrough
Copy link
Member Author

For 2014

In addition to the 2013 test, we will add a new test, to assess whether the default-tied-status/@code or transaction/tied-status/@code is on the IATI TiedStatus codelist.

Notes

  • We understand the issues around the tied status element in IATI, and how it relates to the DAC CRS way of reporting.
  • We understand this has been flagged as a change for the standard for the 2.01 integer upgrade.
  • The tests will be amended in future years as the standard evolves.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants