Each of the two location indicators should have half of the score

[markbrough]

The location indicator has a weight of 3.5 according to the Index technical paper. However, there are now two location indicators. They should each receive half of the points, i.e. 1.75 points. Currently, the total available points is 103.5.

(NB Github's preview of the CSV file shows the incorrect line from the CSV file, but it is correct when you click through.)

aid-transparency-tracker/tests/indicators.csv

Lines 24 to 25 in 9c09d53

	For organisations such as IFIs and private foundations, which do not have an “aid allocation” policy, equivalent documents are accepted; for example, “investment strategy/policy” or “grantmaking policy”.",5,0,0.01875,1,,
	procurement-policy,Procurement policy,publication,,Organisational planning and commitments,"An organisation’s procurement procedures explain the process used to tender and contract (invite bids for) goods and services. This must fully explain the criteria on which decisions are made, and could be in a single procurement policy document or attached to each tender.

[Bjwebb]

Sorry for taking a while to reply to this. We choose only 1 of the location indicators for each publisher, depending on how they're using activity-scope. This could probably be better presented in the interface, but obviously would require some custom code.

This relates to this bit in the technical paper: https://www.publishwhatyoufund.org/app/uploads/dlm_uploads/2024/02/2024_Aid_Transparency_Index_Technical_Paper.pdf#page=57

*Exclusions based on the Scope element are only applied to organisations that we can confirm are using Scope to identify whether an activity has a subnational location