You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
My expectation was that this rule would be applied as:
ManufacturerModelName contains "LightSpeed VCT" and Modality contains "CT" and (ImageType contains LOCAL or SeriesDescription contains Localizer)
Instead it was applied as below (without grouping the or condition):
ManufacturerModelName contains "LightSpeed VCT" and Modality contains "CT" and ImageType contains LOCAL or SeriesDescription contains Localizer
As a result of this, we greylisted an MRI that had a SeriesDescription of "Localizer".
I suspect this is a bug - and that lines within a filter rule should be considered "grouped", but wanted to check with you first. If you agree this is a bug, I can work on it (although I won't be able to start for a couple weeks). Since we were deidentifying an MRI, we simply removed the two filter rules which were incorrectly hit to get around the current issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@vsoch - We came across a possible issue today with how filter rules are applied.
In the sample dicom recipe, there are many filter rules defined such as below:
deid.dicom - line 26
My expectation was that this rule would be applied as:
ManufacturerModelName contains "LightSpeed VCT" and Modality contains "CT" and (ImageType contains LOCAL or SeriesDescription contains Localizer)
Instead it was applied as below (without grouping the or condition):
ManufacturerModelName contains "LightSpeed VCT" and Modality contains "CT" and ImageType contains LOCAL or SeriesDescription contains Localizer
As a result of this, we greylisted an MRI that had a SeriesDescription of "Localizer".
I suspect this is a bug - and that lines within a filter rule should be considered "grouped", but wanted to check with you first. If you agree this is a bug, I can work on it (although I won't be able to start for a couple weeks). Since we were deidentifying an MRI, we simply removed the two filter rules which were incorrectly hit to get around the current issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: