pyinfra community modules #1099
Replies: 3 comments 3 replies
-
Heya @apecnascimento, it seems like pyinfra has not yet reached the size where a split between core & community makes sense, the author encourages contributing new operations and facts to the core for now. Looks like there's several such PRs. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Very much open to thoughts here, would happily start a community repo if preferred. But also having everything builtin is actually quite a good experience I think. Thinking back over the years this hasn’t been much of an issue, mainly because the operation testing tends to be strong enough to prevent regressions (operations very rarely change). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
how about deploys? https://docs.pyinfra.com/en/3.x/api/deploys.html |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
In Ansible we have the community.general collection to group community modules, making the cycle of creating new modules occur in parallel with the Ansible Core functionalities. Is there any equivalent initiative in pyinfra, so that the community can create connectors, Facts and operators in addition to those in the pyinfra core?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions