You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
After closing the connections we are seeing a few thread errors that seem impossible to get rid of. At the point where they are sent to stderr there is nothing left running and the code has closed the gateway.
Unhandled exception in thread started by
Error in sys.excepthook:
Original exception was:
Running execnet with debug show this:
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] RECEIVERTHREAD: starting to run
[53488] gw0 sent <Message.CHANNEL_EXEC channelid=1 len=6354>
[53488] gw0 sent <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 'platform_information()'>
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] received <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 ('Ubuntu', '12.04', 'precise')>
[53488] gw0 sent <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 'machine_type()'>
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] received <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 'x86_64'>
[53488] gw0 sent <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 'shortname()'>
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] received <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 'node1'>
[53488] gw0 sent <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 len=324>
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] received <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 None>
[53488] gw0 sent <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 len=127>
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] received <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 None>
[53488] gw0 gateway.exit() called
[53488] gw0 --> sending GATEWAY_TERMINATE
[53488] gw0 --> io.close_write
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] EOF without prior gateway termination message
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] entering finalization
[53488] gw0 finished receiving
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] terminating execution
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] closing read
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] closing write
[53488] gw0 [receiver-thread] leaving finalization
[53488] gw1 [receiver-thread] RECEIVERTHREAD: starting to run
[53488] gw1 sent <Message.CHANNEL_EXEC channelid=1 len=6354>
[53488] gw1 sent <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 'platform_information()'>
[53488] gw1 [receiver-thread] received <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 ('CentOS', '6.4', 'Final')>
[53488] gw1 sent <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 'machine_type()'>
[53488] gw1 [receiver-thread] received <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 'x86_64'>
[53488] gw1 sent <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 'shortname()'>
[53488] gw1 [receiver-thread] received <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 'node2'>
[53488] gw1 sent <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 len=324>
[53488] gw1 [receiver-thread] received <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 None>
[53488] gw1 sent <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 len=127>
[53488] gw1 [receiver-thread] received <Message.CHANNEL_DATA channelid=1 None>
[53488] gw1 gateway.exit() called
[53488] gw1 --> sending GATEWAY_TERMINATE
[53488] gw1 --> io.close_write
[53488] === atexit cleanup <Group []> ===
[53488] gw0 1 channel.__del__
[53488] gw1 1 channel.__del__
Unhandled exception in thread started by
Error in sys.excepthook:
Original exception was:
It looks as though this is happening in the threading module in Python itself. I am not sure something is possible to eat up these messages.
There is a ticket open in the Python bug tracker that mentions this problem is closed:
--- /usr/lib/python2.5/threading.py.orig 2008-02-04 13:58:18.000000000 -0600
+++ ./threading.py 2008-02-05 11:55:33.000000000 -0600
@@ -472,34 +472,18 @@
_sys.stderr.write("Exception in thread %s:\n%s\n" %
(self.getName(), _format_exc()))
else:
- # Do the best job possible w/o a huge amt. of code to
- # approximate a traceback (code ideas from
- # Lib/traceback.py)
- exc_type, exc_value, exc_tb = self.__exc_info()
- try:
- print>>self.__stderr, (
- "Exception in thread " + self.getName() +
- " (most likely raised during interpreter shutdown):")
- print>>self.__stderr, (
- "Traceback (most recent call last):")
- while exc_tb:
- print>>self.__stderr, (
- ' File "%s", line %s, in %s' %
- (exc_tb.tb_frame.f_code.co_filename,
- exc_tb.tb_lineno,
- exc_tb.tb_frame.f_code.co_name))
- exc_tb = exc_tb.tb_next
- print>>self.__stderr, ("%s: %s" % (exc_type, exc_value))
- # Make sure that exc_tb gets deleted since it is a memory
- # hog; deleting everything else is just for thoroughness
- finally:
- del exc_type, exc_value, exc_tb
+ # If _sys is missing, then the interpreter is shutting
+ # down and the thread should no longer exist. If this
+ # happens, ignore the error and exit gracefully.
+ pass
else:
if __debug__:
self._note("%s.__bootstrap(): normal return", self)
finally:
- self.__stop()
+ # Exceptions will also be raised during stop/delete if the
+ # interpreter is shutting down. Ignore these as well.
try:
+ self.__stop()
self.__delete()
except:
pass
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We have been able to get rid of these empty errors by closing sys.stderr and sys.stdout in ceph-deploy (see reference issue http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/7594 )
This is how we now call main():
#!python
if __name__ == '__main__':
try:
sys.exit(main())
finally:
# This block is crucial to avoid having issues with
# Python spitting non-sense thread exceptions. We have already
# handled what we could, so close stderr and stdout.
if not os.environ.get('CEPH_DEPLOY_TEST'):
try:
sys.stdout.close()
except:
pass
try:
sys.stderr.close()
except:
pass
After closing the connections we are seeing a few thread errors that seem impossible to get rid of. At the point where they are sent to stderr there is nothing left running and the code has closed the gateway.
Running execnet with debug show this:
It looks as though this is happening in the threading module in Python itself. I am not sure something is possible to eat up these messages.
There is a ticket open in the Python bug tracker that mentions this problem is closed:
http://bugs.python.org/issue1722344
One of the patches that one commenter added looks like what we would need to get rid of them (http://bugs.python.org/file9356/1722344_squelch_exception.patch)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: