Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can 0.9.1 be pushed to PyPI? #12

Closed
merrellb opened this issue Apr 29, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed

Can 0.9.1 be pushed to PyPI? #12

merrellb opened this issue Apr 29, 2017 · 6 comments

Comments

@merrellb
Copy link

No description provided.

@njsmith
Copy link
Member

njsmith commented Apr 29, 2017

Even 0.9.1 is pretty buggy compared to master + my pending pull requests :-(. And I still haven't gotten around to redoing the public API to make it amenable to multi-protocol HTTP/1 + WS servers...

I've sort of been figuring that when I get back to working on WS stuff then the first thing I'll need to do is fork this package and upload to pypi under a new name, hopefully temporarily but just to make some progress... this whole "writing a new I/O lib" thing has distracted me a bit, but I will get around to it eventually :-). But... @merrellb, if you're needing this, maybe we should go ahead and get started with that now?

I actually have commit rights to this repo, but I'm not going to go merging big rewrite PRs into @jeamland's repo without @jeamland at least saying something like "yeah @njsmith you should use those commit rights to do whatever you think best" :-). And I don't have PyPI access anyway.

@jeamland: if you don't have time/interest in keeping up with this, then I bet @Lukasa would be happy to accept it into the python-hyper umbrella organization? I'm happy to do the grunt-work if you want – let me know. (I guess I'd just need admin rights to this repo + on pypi; my pypi username is "njs".)

@Lukasa
Copy link
Member

Lukasa commented Apr 29, 2017

Yup, python-hyper would be happy to have this lib. 👍

@merrellb
Copy link
Author

merrellb commented May 1, 2017

When working on a basic trio integration (python-trio/trio#124) I ran into some issues with 0.9.0 (I don't quite recall but I think they were related to using h11 0.5). I would certainly be excited to see more active development as something like hyper-ws.

@jeamland
Copy link
Collaborator

jeamland commented May 3, 2017

I've applied all of @njsmith's PRs and made a few tweaks to get the build back to green. I've called this version 0.10.0 and it's up on PyPI now.

I'm more than happy to take up @Lukasa on his offer to transfer ownership to python-hyper.

@Lukasa
Copy link
Member

Lukasa commented May 3, 2017

Ok @jeamland, I've just invited you to the python-hyper organisation. Feel free to do a repository transfer at any time. You may also want to add me to the PyPI maintainers for the repo (username is as my GitHub username).

Once you're on board, I'll set up some teams and permissions etc. 😁

Welcome on board!

@njsmith
Copy link
Member

njsmith commented May 3, 2017

@jeamland: awesome, thanks!

@jeamland jeamland closed this as completed May 3, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants