setting security, causes errors. Omitting security makes our API docs less helpful. What to do? #993
LewisCowlesMotive
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment
-
There's no way for now however it should be fairly easy to implement it with configuration object in place. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hello 👋
We're transitioning from a Connexion 2 codebase to a FastAPI one, and this repo has helped us implement a middleware which enables request / response validation to continue against the spec so that we can continue to improve our API and know when things don't match our communicated contracts, for both requests and responses.
I recently picked up a file with no security entries. ReDocly rightly complained about this and the lack of servers nominated.
When I add them, we get errors from the middleware
I've tidied this up a bit, but it seems to me like I'd like to improve both our security and the OpenAPI separately.
We are nigh-on exactly the same as https://swagger.io/docs/specification/v3_0/authentication/bearer-authentication/#describing-bearer-authentication
Someone tried to be clever and implement via type
apiKey
; because we technically dont' use the Authorization header (too late to change now the API has existed with this "quirk" for a while.Anyway, in the same way response checking is disabled, is it possible to disable the security and server checks?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions