Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Supporting the case torch sparse coo tensor as neural network input #579

Open
elichienxD opened this issue Mar 29, 2023 · 3 comments
Open
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@elichienxD
Copy link

🚀 Feature

We would like the Opacus DPSGD to work with the case where the neural network input is a torch sparse coo tensor.

Motivation

Similar to issue #350 , there are cases where the input of the neural network is a torch sparse tensor. In our case, our data is exactly a torch sparse coo tensor and it is impossible to fit the dense version of it into GPU. It would be great if Opacus DPSGD (grad_sampler...etc) is compatible with input of the nerual networks being a sparse tensor.

Pitch

We would like Opacus to be compatible with the case where torch sparse coo tensor is the neural network input. Currently, even if I modify the grad_sample_module.py L62 from = grad_sample to += grad_sample to prevent errors, the results are still incorrect. That is, the resulting gradients are different (with a fixed seed) for dense input vs sparse input. The model cannot be trained well with the sparse input while it can with the dense input. It would be a great help if there is any suggestion on solving this issue.

Alternatives

None.

Additional context

None.

Looking forward to hearing back from you, thank you in advance!

@alexandresablayrolles
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for proposing this feature. I see that you mentioned coding it up, do you have a PR draft? Happy to take a look at it.

@alexandresablayrolles alexandresablayrolles self-assigned this Apr 12, 2023
@elichienxD
Copy link
Author

Hi @alexandresablayrolles ,

Sorry for my late response. Currently, we use it in our own project and it may be hard to release the code before its publication. Nevertheless, I'll try to write a minimal example to reproduce the problem (maybe as a Jupyter/Colab notebook). I will get it back to you (hopefully) in a few days. I apologize that I'm pretty busy this week...

Thanks,
Eli

@elichienxD
Copy link
Author

Hi @alexandresablayrolles ,

I manage to write the following minimal example Colab.

Note that I modify grad_sample_module.py L62 from = grad_sample to += grad_sample to prevent errors as I mentioned earlier. The version of the packages should not matter I guess. Please let me know if you found any errors in my code.

I guess the issue might be at the function prepare_module() in my code? If not, then it seems like the opacus does not support sparse tensor input correctly? Sorry that I'm not very familiar with opacus so trivial mistake may happen...

Thanks,
Eli

@HuanyuZhang HuanyuZhang added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants