-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 190
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I'm not supposed to use Que 0.x with Rails 6, am I? #301
Comments
It would be interesting to see the stack trace. I can tell you that EDIT: After performing more tests, it seems that specs don't fully surface all the issues. Specifically, the |
I already solved that reading through another issue. It was related to the way ActiveJob send arguments to Que and how they were coming in a different format than what Que could take. All my doubts were not entirely solved however. I was looking to replace Sidekiq on a Heroku app with a library like Que that could run jobs on the same process and be more efficient than Rails' in memory asynchronous jobs. Can you clarify if it's possible to run Que as the same process of my app on this Heroku dyno? |
@duartemvix Would you mind elaborating on the formatting issue? What did you do to solve the Time to String error? It looks like this will probably work for my team: |
That's the solution I used indeed. I was having further problems trying to run a Que server simultaneously with a web process in Heroku but things are going fine at this moment. Apparently I couldn't even run Async jobs with Que I remember and what I did was putting aside this library in favor of Rails' async. |
I've been following all the guides and README's but I'm afraid Rails adapters on ActiveJob for Que still use a very old configuration for these libraries.
I've been getting basic errors such as
No impilicit conversion of Time into String
and it led me to think that's just so outdated that I couldn't even begin to fix it by myself.I'm assuming all of you who's using it still uses Rails 4? Or Perhaps Rails 5?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: