We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
It seems that column transformation functions defined using macros can behave differently than functions defined without macros. Here's an example:
using Match, DataFrames, Query df = DataFrame(a = [1, 2], b = [3, missing]) f(x) = @match x begin 3 => "three" _ => missing end df |> @map({_..., c = f(_.b)}) |> @replacena("successfully replaced")
The output still has NAs in it, despite the final @replacena command.
@replacena
If I replace f with an equivalent version without macros (even just the one obtained by expanding the macro), this works as expected.
f
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
It seems that column transformation functions defined using macros can behave differently than functions defined without macros. Here's an example:
The output still has NAs in it, despite the final
@replacena
command.If I replace
f
with an equivalent version without macros (even just the one obtained by expanding the macro), this works as expected.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: