scales: 2 issues

[JJHelly]

Aloha.
Just discovered scales and want to thank you for that. I find a couple of things to comment on.

1. scale_x_continuous(labels = scales::label_number(accuracy = 0.5),
   breaks = c(-124, -120, -116))
   if accuracy = 0.0 (ie, integer) then the values on the axis are NA.

2. It seems to me that 'accuracy' is more correctly 'precision'

Mahalo for the work.

[teunbrand]

To round to integers you should use accuracy = 1, not accuracy = 0.
With regards to the accuracy/precision distinction, I don't really know what distinguishes these terms with regards to number formatting. However, I've seen 'precision' used to roughly mean 'the number of digits', which is not what the accuracy argument encodes.

[thomasp85]

accuracy is correctly used here as it relates to how accurate the resulting label is to the true value. precision is more related to sampling and how good you are at repeating a measurement