You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At every inner iteration 0, the nlls_iterate is started with s=x0=0.0, which will trigger an expensive call to eval_HP or or m matrix-vector products with zero-vector y
that ultimately will return a zero matrix...
Either check if all(y==0) at the entry of calculate_sHs. A good option is to not call tensoreval_f when we already have the answer s=0 then f(s) = r_k
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Under the context of Tensor-Newton Subproblem.
Multiple redundant calls to
eval_HF
wheneval_HP
is presentProblem
In the recursive call to
evaltensor_hf
there is a redundant call toeval_hf
atx=params%x
that does not change withing a recursive call tonlls_solve
.Fix
Add flag to avoid calling uneccesarily
eval_hf
withinevaltensor_hf
...Showcase
Lanczos.f90
with or withouteval_hp
call backMultiple redundant calls to
eval_HP
At every inner iteration 0, the
nlls_iterate
is started withs
=x0
=0.0, which will trigger an expensive call toeval_HP
or orm
matrix-vector products with zero-vectory
that ultimately will return a zero matrix...
Either check if
all(y==0)
at the entry ofcalculate_sHs
. A good option is to not calltensoreval_f
when we already have the answer s=0 then f(s) = r_kThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: