diff --git a/docs/source/examples/best-practices.rst b/docs/source/examples/best-practices.rst
index 03e26bf5..fbfd8f0c 100644
--- a/docs/source/examples/best-practices.rst
+++ b/docs/source/examples/best-practices.rst
@@ -48,8 +48,8 @@ Spilling from Device
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dask-CUDA offers several different ways to enable automatic spilling from device memory.
-The best method often depends on the specific workflow. For classic ETL workloads with
-`Dask-cuDF `_, cuDF spilling is usually the
+The best method often depends on the specific workflow. For classic ETL workloads using
+`Dask cuDF `_, cuDF spilling is usually the
best place to start. See :ref:`Spilling from device ` for more details.
Accelerated Networking
diff --git a/docs/source/spilling.rst b/docs/source/spilling.rst
index 04cfa05c..cfc6cfcf 100644
--- a/docs/source/spilling.rst
+++ b/docs/source/spilling.rst
@@ -112,9 +112,9 @@ to enable compatibility mode, which automatically calls ``unproxy()`` on all fun
cuDF Spilling
-------------
-When executing a `Dask-cuDF `_
-(i.e. Dask DataFrame) ETL workflow, it is usually best to leverage `native spilling support in
-cuDF `.
+When executing an ETL workflow with `Dask cuDF `_
+(i.e. Dask DataFrame), it is usually best to leverage `native spilling support in cuDF
+`.
Native cuDF spilling has an important advantage over the other methodologies mentioned
above. When JIT-unspill or default spilling are used, the worker is only able to spill
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ Statistics
When cuDF spilling is enabled, it is also possible to have cuDF collect basic
spill statistics. Collecting this information can be a useful way to understand
-the performance of Dask-cuDF workflows with high memory utilization.
+the performance of memory-intensive workflows using cuDF.
When deploying a ``LocalCUDACluster``, cuDF spilling can be enabled with the
``cudf_spill_stats`` argument:
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ for more information on the available spill-statistics options.
Limitations
~~~~~~~~~~~
-Although cuDF spilling is the best option for most Dask-cuDF ETL workflows,
+Although cuDF spilling is the best option for most ETL workflows using Dask cuDF,
it will be much less effective if that workflow converts between ``cudf.DataFrame``
and other data formats (e.g. ``cupy.ndarray``). Once the underlying device buffers
are "exposed" to external memory references, they become "unspillable" by cuDF.