Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] Allow multiple/alternative servers with "fast switching" between them. #26

Open
tehguitarist opened this issue Jan 25, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@tehguitarist
Copy link

tehguitarist commented Jan 25, 2024

Another low priority request but I guess there are two use cases for this request:

  1. Someone hosts their own server, but also has a friend with a server they connect to as well.

  2. The ability to connect to a local IP address when at home (for faster speeds, and if loopback configuration is out of the person's ability, or complicated by the use of VPN's) but an external URL when out of home. This is likely the more common use case for my request. I'm not sure if ABS reports a UUID or similar, but obviously the ability to seamlessly move between the two and still update progress on downloaded books (despite changing between local and external addresses) would be nice.

I guess for the second use case, a potential automation would be

IF device is on "My-Wi-Fi SSID" THEN use 192.168.0.2 server; 
ELSE use https://abs.server.com;
@rasmuslos
Copy link
Owner

Support for multiple servers is not planned. Using different IP-addresses for different networks might get added, but not in the near future

@bemble
Copy link

bemble commented May 19, 2024

Is there any “profile on the same server” feature considered?
My use-case: I use my profile for my audio books and we have also a shared account with my wife for the kids, to keep the progression independently from who is playing the book (mostly in the car).

@rasmuslos
Copy link
Owner

I will try to add this functionality, it should be possible.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants