Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lower os versions, add guards #16

Merged

Conversation

mattmassicotte
Copy link
Contributor

Hello!

First, thanks for making this package. I've been using it for quite a while and it's great.

I'm just about to start using it in a new project, and I'd like to keep the OS version requirements low. However, I wasn't able, because this package has them just a little higher than I need. However, lowering them wasn't too hard, just had to add a few availability guards here and there.

I also bumped the package swift version. This might seem paradoxical, but I think it is reasonable to require 5.9 (Xcode 14) as a minimum. And that will allow supporting visionOS explicitly.

@raymondjavaxx raymondjavaxx self-requested a review April 20, 2024 00:33
Copy link
Owner

@raymondjavaxx raymondjavaxx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @mattmassicotte,

Thank you for contributing this! I'm glad you found the package useful. 🚢

@raymondjavaxx raymondjavaxx merged commit bf488f2 into raymondjavaxx:main Apr 20, 2024
1 of 5 checks passed
@mattmassicotte mattmassicotte deleted the feature/lower-versions branch April 20, 2024 01:27
@mattmassicotte
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ohh, CI is a messed up now. I’ll have a look at this!

@raymondjavaxx
Copy link
Owner

I just merged a CI fix in #17. The macos-latest label was still resolving to macOS 12 🤯

@mattmassicotte
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes! GitHub actions requires a bit of babysitting there 😞

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants